A Dolls House, by Henry Ibsen Essay -- Henry Ibsen, A Doll House

I locate the allegorical implications specifically, very beneficial to the general plot, just as the incongruity that sets us up for tense circumstances in which any dramatization ought to do. Straightforwardly after the title of the dramatization, we are quickly prepared with the social gauges of the time as the principal character is recorded: â€Å"Torvald Helmer - a lawyer,† and underneath his name: â€Å"Nora - his wife.† She regardless of anything else is initial a spouse and a mother; these titles accept her essential obligations and duties. Nora anyway isn't significantly more than a â€Å"trophy wife† to Mr. Helmer and a mate to her youngsters. Torvald alludes to her with what appear to be corrupting scratch nding, a large number of ladies have (875). This announcement takes into consideration Nora to understand her numerous achievements and her value of a bigger honor than what she has ever been given. Torvald quits alluding to her utilizing flying crea ture illustrations, he presently observes her qualities that far surpass his own. Rather than her depending on him, he is needy upon all her his dearest open picture. Nora no longer depends on his cases of wide wings to protect you with, (871) she breaks free and uses her own as of late found wings to escape Torvald’s shielding. One all through the play is nearly seeking after the â€Å"greatest miracle,† yet can see Nora’s battle to break liberated from her confined jail. Nora has liberated herself to fly similarly as winged creatures were made to do, and the sound of an entryway pummeling shut underlines her picked up quality. Works Cited Ibsen, Henrik. A Doll House. 1983. Print.

The Intentional Death Of Francis Macomber Essay Example For Students

The Intentional Death Of Francis Macomber Essay Ernest Hemingway has made an artful culmination of secret in his storyThe Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber. The puzzle does notreveal itself to the peruser until the finish of the story, yet itleaves a great deal to the creative mind. Toward the finish of the storyMargaret Macomber murders her significant other coincidentally, so as to savehim from being destroyed by an enormous Buffalo while on a safari inAfrica. The puzzle is whether this murdering was trulyaccidental, or deliberate. If it somehow managed to be consideredintentional, there would surely must be proof in thestory proposing such, with a reasonable intention also. What makesthis puzzle remarkable is that Hemingway gives the peruser numerousinstances that would lead the peruser to devise an acceptablemotive, yet human instinct tells the peruser that this slaughtering couldnot have been purposeful. From a simply target examination of thestory, the peruser would see definitely more proof supporting thetheory of a deli berate murdering instead of an incidental one. We will compose a custom article on The Intentional Death Of Francis Macomber explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now The pieces of information supporting that Margaret murdered Francisintentionally can best be seen when watching and considering thebackground data on both Francis Macomber, and Margaretherself. (Hemingway 1402). What is additionally significant is that Margotand Francis have altogether different characters. This is clearlyseen when the storyteller states, (Hemingway 1402). With this modest quantity of foundation data, the genuine motivefor a purposeful slaughtering can be found. This can unmistakably be seenin the discussion of Francis Macomber in the wake of slaughtering the buffalowhen he states, (Hemingway 1408. (Hemingway 1409). Robert Wilson,the control on the chase, gives the peruser an outside perspectiveinto this intricate and pained relationship. In light of thequote above Hemingway 1409). Robert Wilson is by all accounts directly in his depictions of the couple,and their relationship all through the story. On the off chance that this is valid, andnone of his assumptions about the couple are bogus, at that point he gainsmore believability towards the finish of the story. It is at this pointthat he turns into the supporter of Margot activities, regardless of the factthat they were purposeful. It is Wilson that gives the peruser thebest depiction of the connection among Francis and his significant other. It is his knowledge into Margot, notwithstanding, that is the most detailed,and which implies that she may be able to do such anact. From this shrewd examination of the two, Wilson shows the readerseveral significant things. One is the reality, in spite of the fact that somewhatmachiavellian, that over her significant other. Another perception that Isomewhat significant is the This is the pitilessness that Wilson observesin the entry above.This, as she would before long observe, was not thecase. One of the most significant entries in the story happens in themoments not long before Francis and Robert Wilson go into the bushafter the wild ox. After Margot shoot the deadly shot, furtherevidence is given by Robert Wilson that bolsters the assertionthat the slaughtering was purposeful Hemingway 1411). Wilson, whoseems to be precise in his evaluation of the relationship, seemsa sound observer to the executing and because of these realities, hisopinion with respect to the intention of the murdering is trustworthy to the readeras well.. story. From the entirety of the proof given in the story, and from an objectiveanalysis of the discussion and portrayal, it is protected to maketheassumption that the killings were to be sure purposeful. There issimply insufficient substantial proof given in the discussion ornarration that would recommend in any case declaration. A CharacterAnalysis of Francis Macomber From Hemingways The Short HappyLife of Francis MacomberIn Hemingways The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber, theauthor shows his verifiable capacity to bring characters tolife by presenting the peruser in extraordinary detail to the maincharacter, Francis Macomber, through shifting abstract instruments. .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .postImageUrl , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .focused content region { min-tallness: 80px; position: relative; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:hover , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:visited , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:active { border:0!important; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .clearfix:after { content: ; show: table; clear: both; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e { show: square; progress: foundation shading 250ms; webkit-change: foundation shading 250ms; width: 100%; darkness: 1; progress: haziness 250ms; webkit-change: murkiness 250ms; foundation shading: #95A5A6; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:active , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:hover { obscurity: 1; progress: mistiness 250ms; webkit-change: darkness 250ms; foundation shading: #2C3E50; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .focused content region { width: 100%; position: relativ e; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .ctaText { outskirt base: 0 strong #fff; shading: #2980B9; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: intense; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; content enhancement: underline; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .postTitle { shading: #FFFFFF; text dimension: 16px; text style weight: 600; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; width: 100%; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .ctaButton { foundation shading: #7F8C8D!important; shading: #2980B9; fringe: none; fringe sweep: 3px; box-shadow: none; text dimension: 14px; textual style weight: striking; line-stature: 26px; moz-fringe span: 3px; content adjust: focus; content embellishment: none; content shadow: none; width: 80px; min-stature: 80px; foundation: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/modules/intelly-related-posts/resources/pictures/basic arrow.png)no-rehash; position: outright; right: 0; top: 0; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:hover .ctaButton { foundation shading: #34495E!important; } .u9662f0feefeb0 7e80b658c3ec522896e .focused content { show: table; stature: 80px; cushioning left: 18px; top: 0; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e-content { show: table-cell; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; cushioning right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-adjust: center; width: 100%; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:after { content: ; show: square; clear: both; } READ: BSAD 18/118 - Business Law EssayThe peruser learns colossal insight concerning Francis, just as theother two essential characters, Margaret and Mr.Wilson, throughcreative depiction that incorporates every character thoughts,their activities, and their responses towards the occasions of thestory. Francis Macombers inside attributes and impressionsare uncovered through such omniscient explanations as:In expansion, more subtleties are uncovered about the character ofFrancis through the other chief characters and even throughthe characters who assume a little job in the story (e.g., thegun-bearers). For instance, (p 250). By methods for a blend ofthis kind of data, Francis Macombers character is changeddue to steady maltreatment from different characters, an inward strugglewith dread and humiliation, and, in the long run, by scorn a deephatred for Mr. Wilson and a fairly calmer contempt for MargaretMacomber. An underlying reason in the last changes of Francis character canbe credited to the consistent maltreatment endured on account of hiswife, and, quickly, by Mr. WilsonFor model, in p 259. Francisand Margaret have clearly arrived at a state of stagnation-stagnation in their affections for one another and stagnation intheir want for the relationship. The consideration from societypress (and society individuals), talked about in p 237-p 238, is all the more thanlikely an extra main impetus for Margaret too. Thereader gets the feeling that she needs the consideration, good,bad, or detached. Howeverhe shows weakness without fearof regret from his better half. Nonetheless, the regret hehimself, somewhere inside, feels, that starts to turn Mr. Macomberaround. Also, Mr. Wilson additionally adds to thiscompounding misuse. Despite the fact that, generally, Mr. Wilsons emotions areperceivably kept inside the limits of his own brain, the effectsof these considerations despite everything exists. To outline, in p 54, Mr. Wilsonis contemplating internally, So hes a ridiculous four-letter man as wellas a wicked defeatist. I rather enjoyed him too until today. As thereader advances through the story, clearly theabusive comments, contemplations, and activities of Mr. Wilson, andespecially those of Margaret, are focal factors in contributingto the progressions that occur in the character of FrancisMacomber. Francis winds up battling with dread and humiliation fromthe beginning of the story, despite the fact that the subtleties of the underlying fearare uncovered to the peruser to some degree later. This interior strugglewith dread and shame is a central factor in hissubsequent change. Hemingway places the peruser in a positionto settle on choices about the impacts of the beforehand discussedabuse as it identifies with Francis inward fight with dread andembarrassment. Obviously these emotions assume a key job in thedevelopment of the character, yet this maltreatment likewise raises a fewquestions. Is Macomber influenced enough by the humiliation andthe dread brought about by the scene with the lion (p 168-p 229) to makethis last change? Is the occurrence with the lion in thebush the contributing variable to Francis profound established changes? No,if it were that straightforward, Hemingway would have prevailing in creatinga rather slow story. To refer to an occurrence, in p 89. Likewise, laterin the story, Mr. Wilson contributes ostensibly to Francisfeelings of humiliation by bedding Margaret. In this capacity,Mr. Wilson causes Francis to endure the best embarrassmentthat a man can persevere. And afterward Mr. Wilson scoured salt into thewound by noting Topping to Francis investigation into the state ofhis earlier evenings rest (p 269). Doubtlessly, the episode with thelion caused an unbelievable dread mind

Condescension in the Ranks How to Handle Snide Remarks at Work

Condescension in the Ranks How to Handle Snide Remarks at Work One of the biggest characteristics a workplace must have is harmony among the workers so that it can be a healthy and productive work environment.Unfortunately, sometimes some colleagues know to throw a remark or two on your way for various reasons.Condescending work colleagues who are persistent in their snide remarks are the basic example of harmful work behavior.There is a big difference between a witty comment that is occasionally brought up in order to lighten up the atmosphere and consistently harmful comments that get you off your balance.Being a target of a snide remark is nothing new, it has, actually, become a mundane and everyday experience.Have in mind that throwing a couple of snide remarks among friends is a normal thing, however, if you are not well acquainted with the colleague or colleagues at work that constantly annoy you with their remarks, then it might be a problem.In further writing of the text, you will learn what are some of the ways you can use that can help you in handling snide remarks, how you can show yourself as an emotionally strong person so that people avoid throwing snarky remarks at you, etc.By the end of the article, you will be able to read a brief psychological insight into why people use snide remarks and what do they want to achieve by using them at their workplaces.GIVE THE COLLEAGUE THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBTThis is the first logical step that one takes when a snide remark is made about them.This applies if the colleague in question is throwing a snide remark at you for the first time.Just give that colleague the benefit of the doubt. They might have been nervous and it might have slipped up accidentally.Using sarcastic comments and similar snide remarks is a common way of showing that the person is just trying to be friends with you.It does not mean that they are doing it on purpose. It is the same as if someone you smile at does not return the smile, and you automatically assume that they are rude.Before doing anything always consider the intention of the comment, because maybe the comment was not of mean nature but a sign of a friendly teasing nature.You should try this way in order to avoid escalation of the situation. In other words, you could make an elephant out of a fly and further decrease the quality of the working atmosphere in your office, if it was just a witty, one-time remark.AVOID THE COLLEAGUEAvoiding the colleague is a useful step but it is not one that is always plausible. If the snide remarks really get under your skin, you can always try to avoid the colleague.The problem arises if that colleague is an important person that crosses paths with you daily.This step would not help you in the long run because it will give confirmation to the colleague that the snide remarks get to you and that you will only run if met with snide remarks.Even though avoiding the colleague could sound like the only option in the heat of the moment, the only situation where avoiding the colleague can w ork is if you are employed somewhere where you do not plan on staying for some extended period.In addition, if your work results would not be affected by your choice to avoid the colleague whose snide remarks are bothering you, then it can also be a good idea to avoid them.If you plan on sticking longer on that job position, then it might be a good idea to consider some other ways of handling snide remarks.Even though it is not a good way to handle a colleague who is bothering you with their remarks, it is still a possible way that can be considered. COMPLETELY IGNORE THE COLLEAGUEThis one is a bit similar to the previous entry but it has a major difference.If a colleagues remarks are really getting under your skin, you can try and completely ignore them.The ramifications are similar to the previous entry: it might affect the working atmosphere and it might affect the work projects that you two share if you do share some at all.One of the major differences is that you actually confr ont the colleague that is bothering you, in a way.If the colleague sees that you are completely ignoring, not only their snide remarks but also their legitimate questions, they might suspect something is wrong between the two of you and issue a conversation to see what is going on.After talking, you can start with a clean slate.The main idea with this entry is to show the colleague that is bothering you that you do not like the snide comments they are throwing at you and, at the same time, show them that you can give minimal to no attention to them as a form of retaliation.It might be seen as a childish move, but so are the constant remarks that they are directing to you.ANALYZE THE SITUATION AND THE REMARK DIRECTED AT YOUThis entry is one of the interesting ones, as it involves evaluating oneself.First things first, the analysis of the situation means that you should ask yourself in what situation were the two of you when the remark was tossed at you.If it was a situation closely l inked with a particular work project or a characteristic that you have, for example, chewing loudly while at the break room, then it was a slight critique of you disguised as a remark.The remark itself would serve as a direct explanation of that characteristic and why it must be changed.This one is one of the deeper and philosophical entries in this article because it basically tells you to look beyond the snide comment and find the inner core and meaning of the comment in order to help you.Of course, not every snide remark will be a call to better yourself. You can always try and seek the deeper meaning behind the remark.This entry cannot be seen as a way to stop the snide remarks made by the colleague, but as a way to employ your brain to not look at them as a shallow way to make a quick laugh, but as a critique to improve over that characteristic that has been ridiculed through self-improvement, which is one of the most important things that one could do.You know that old phrase that says there is a grain of truth in every joke? Well ask yourself if the snide remarks youre faced with holds that grain of truth or more.This is an interesting entry that you can use because it actually can help you analyze yourself and help you think more about your strengths and weaknesses rather than the snide remark that might have hurt your feelings.There are no negative aspects in the workplace, except that the colleague might continue messing with you with the snide remarks, however, you might better yourself so much that, in the end, the colleague will run out of material.The point of the analysis is to critically assess what youre facing. Critically means youll try to be objective and neutral as you can and that means that youll clear all vanity out of the way.That in itself is helpful.DO NOT SHOW THAT IT GETS TO YOUThis one is indisputably the hardest entry on this list to achieve.There is a certain amount of negativity and nuisance a person can take before they burst. It is important to know that the colleagues or people who regularly toss around snide remarks aimed at you have the goal of seeing you annoyed.Possessing that knowledge, you can turn the stunt on its head by showing that you do not care about the snide remarks and that they simply do not get to you, at all.There are a few ways to focus your mind away from the person in mind, such as anchoring on a word in your mind until your anger passes, and regularly resting to balance your emotional stability.This entry might prove to be difficult for some people who have a tendency to get angry easily.The people with a short fuse or tendency to let other people get under their skin easily might have problems with this one due to their explosive nature.In that case, it is for the best to read on some techniques on how to relax in a situation that triggers your anger before you look up some ways of handling snide remarks.If you are a member of the infamous club of a short temper, this article mig ht be an interesting read t you.All in all, this way of handling the snide remarks might be more difficult for some people, but it is actually an easy way to keep the working atmosphere in the office and show the colleagues that by not showing that the snide remarks are bothering you enough to show any emotion, you are not the target they are looking for.BE KIND TO THE PROBLEMATIC COLLEAGUEThis one is the ultimate empathic approach. If the colleague is constantly spewing snide remarks about you, one of the interesting approaches is to be really kind to them.There are many benefits to becoming a kind person, one of them being the kindness boomerang. By being kind to him, you are showing that you do not care for the snide remarks they are making about you, and you might inspire him to be kind, as well.Being kind primarily improves your mental state and it might help you more than just handling a snide remark.Actually, empathy is a really important trait in the workplace as it enforces a positive increase in the atmosphere, thus, further increasing productivity.Being kind to the colleague who is getting under your skin is a good way to make him stop using the snide remarks, and is really a simple rule to follow: forgive them and be happy! Source: tutsplus.comTRY TO ESCAPE THE SITUATIONWhen in a workplace, one of the easiest ways to handle the snide remark or, if you see one incoming, avoid it completely.An example of the situation could be this: you see a colleague coming into the break room or your cubicle, or office.Then, when the colleague starts talking, if you see that they are going for a snide remark, look at the clock and say that you have to go do something. Easy as that.Basically, if you know that that one colleague will always try to be funny by getting under your skin, you can always find a way to get out of the room and tell that you have work to do.This entry is actually very similar to the avoiding the colleague entry, the only difference being that, in this case, you are confronting the witty colleague and snuffing them out before they start talking.This is a way to handle the incoming snide remarks but the only disadvantage is that you might cut off the person that might tell you something work-relate d.This can be used for serial snide remarkers, and should be used only if you are absolutely sure that that colleague will not say anything important or productive to you.TALK TO THE COLLEAGUE ABOUT ITTalking to the colleague that is bombarding you with snide remarks is one of the most important things to do, sooner or later.It is important to express yourself and explain to them that their remarks annoy you and that they should stop.Now, there are three ways to talk to the colleague.The first way is to talk to them privately.Simple one on one talk, where you explain the situation to them, explain that you are not comfortable with the remarks and that you do not find them funny.This is the most civilized way to snuff out the situation and continue with your work.The second way of talking is to talk to them on the spot, just after them saying the snide remark.This one is tricky because, for a short-tempered person, the stuff that can come out of their mouth in the heat of the moment might not be something that they are going to proudly retell later.On the other hand, you will come out as a person who does not like being pushed around and annoyed, so you might earn your colleagues respect.It is an interesting way to confront the colleague and their snide remark, but at the same time, this type of confrontation might prove to be a double-edged sword.The third and final way of handling the remark with a conversation is to jokingly confront the colleague with a snide remark of your own.This one can be a tricky road, as you might be stuck in a perpetual competition of who thinks of a better or funnier remark if that colleague is persistent.Even though it sounds childish, it is a way to try and make up a better and funnier remark than them, after which they might stop.It is a strange and childish way to try and handle the remark and the colleague that makes it, however, out of all the three aforementioned ways of talking, it is the one that has the least chance of wo rking.It is important to talk to your colleagues, no matter the circumstances, as you promote open-mindedness and communication with them, which is an important trait for a workplace and colleagues to have.For a person engaged in work, workspace atmosphere is one of the most important aspects of the workplace. Source: researchgate.netIn this part of the text, some reasons and mental profiles for such behavior will be covered in short, and how you can help yourself mentally, in order to deflect those or any other similar remarks easily.First of all, it is really difficult to stick a characteristic on a person that is throwing a snide remark at somebody. Is the person considered being a bully? Or being a mean person?That depends on the nature and frequency of the remarks.If we put a fusion of a bully mindset and a mean mindset into one and surround it with a workplace coat, it can be suggested that the person has been an object of other peoples remarks in their early career or previous jobs.The combination of having been taught to behave like that on their previous workplaces and other factors, for example, the need to be liked, having a big ego, seeing you as being different, are all the prime characteristics of a bully.Of course, being a part of the adult world, it is much easier to talk w ith that colleague that is bothering you, as you all share a common goal in the office.Having said all that, it might possibly be a silly joke that the person uses to connect with other people, as some believe that people often use snide remarks to make themselves look funny and break the ice or relax the situation.Of course, they can get out of line, but the golden rule to follow is for both parties to know when to speak and when to be silent.Secondly, if you have a bit of a shorter fuse than other people, or simply cannot let go if someone is messing with you, in an emotional sense, there are a few things you can do to strengthen psychologically.Firstly, you should focus your thoughts on bright thoughts, on places, people, and objects that inspire you. One should learn to not let a person dictate ones thoughts.Whenever you see the colleague or just any other person that knows how to get under your skin, be ready for their type of action that targets you and show them that it does not bother you anymore.You have greater goals that will require iron will and full attention so that snide remark is just too small to deter you away from your charted goal.Secondly, do not show the victim traits, even if you are one, in their eyes. The person is throwing the snide remarks in your face for their own selfish reasons, so do not give them the satisfaction of showing that it got to you.Even after a while, you should not think about the remark and whether you have done something wrong. Throw those negative feelings and thoughts out the window and focus on your goals, achievements, and inspirations.Finally, there are many ways to strengthen your mental state, for example, deep self-evaluation and progress reflection, if you are interested in reading a detailed explanation, here is an interesting article, in addition to a speech by Amy Morin, a psychotherapist whose expertise is giving advice regarding mental health. ASSERTIVE COMMUNICATIONNow the key thing here is asserti ve communication which basically means youll state the problem without adding oil to the fire.You will take a stance and confront a passive-aggressive colleague, but you wont verbally attack him, nor you will show that his/her comment got to you.You will either address their claim or them in person and expose the convo for what it is verbal aggression.The thing here is that people who are passive-aggressive opt for passivity because theyre afraid of aggression in the open or because they enjoy seeing you confused about the nature of your relationship and downright scared of the thing they may say next.The important thing to do is face them head-on and show them that you are not afraid and that youre a force to be reckoned with. You don’t do that by displaying aggressive behavior yourself because aggression is actually a sign of weakness.You remain calm, analyze their behavior and their potential motives and in a very serene tone, cut the whole thing at its core.Or just use sarcas m, thats what really gets on their nerves as well.CONCLUSIONIn conclusion, the working atmosphere is essential for a workplace to be seen as a productive and healthy work environment.Even though there are always jokers around every office, there is a thin line between saying a witty and funny comment and throwing a snide remark.Have in mind, that it is simply in some peoples nature to joke around by throwing snide remarks, one should always take it as such if the problem does not continue.Be aware that it all depends on your mentality. If you are easy to forgive and not easily let people get under your skin, you are at a greater advantage than the people who cannot emotionally withstand those kinds of attacks with ease.If you are one of the people that cannot easily let go of the snide remarks directed at them, just remember the ways of handling those snide remarks that have been mentioned in the text, and the ways you can exercise your mind to be more resilient to those snide remar ks that are thrown at you.All in all, it is important to understand that there are people and there will always be people who simply enjoy throwing snide remarks at their colleagues, friends or family, and the best possible option is to simply accept them and learn how to handle their snide remarks.

Essay about Biology Milk Lab - 1303 Words

Bonnie Bell Mrs. Legary Biology P.6 21, Sept. 2011 Milk Lab Final This investigation consists of testing the reaction between milk, food coloring, and dishwashing soap. Different kinds of milk were tested, depending on the amount of milk fat content. The investigation was based on 2 questions. Lab one’s problem statement, using only milk fat and food coloring was: How does food coloring react in different kinds of milk fat? The second lab’s problem statement, using milk fat, food coloring, and dishwashing soap was: What happens when detergent is added to different milk fats and food coloring? The expectation is that the milk with higher fat content will have a more dramatic reaction. If the milk has a higher fat content,†¦show more content†¦| The first table shows the results between the milk and food coloring. In milk fat 1, the red food coloring spread fast and wide. In milk fat 2, the red food coloring did the same as milk fat 1. In milk fat 3, the red food coloring spread slowly in an oval shape. In milk fat 4, the red food coloring didn’t expand very big. In milk fat 1, the blue food coloring expanded slowly for a long time and stayed dark blue. In milk fat 2, the blue food coloring spread fast for a long time and stayed in one big glob. In milk fat 3, the blue food coloring looked like a spider web. It starts out light in color and expanded slowly getting darker. In milk fat 4, the blue food coloring got gets lighter as it expands. In milk fat 1, the yellow food coloring was more spread out. In milk fat 2, the yellow food coloring stayed in a little circle. In milk fat 3, the yellow food coloring stayed in a little circle and turned to an orangish-yellow color. In milk fat 4, the yellow food coloring stayed i n a small spot and didn’t spread. In milk fat 1, the green food coloring spread fast but not very big. In milk fat 2, the green food coloring didn’t spread very big. In milk fat 3, the green food coloring spread pretty big. And in milk fat 4, the green food coloring spread quickly. Day 2 dataShow MoreRelatedEnzyme Lab Report Essay2194 Words   |  9 Pagesonly work when a particular substrate fits in their active site. An active site is â€Å"a region on the surface of an enzyme where the substrate binds, and where the reaction occurs†[2]. â€Å"Lactase is an enzyme that breaks down lactose, the sugar in milk. It is produced by the cells lining of the small intestine. Most people are born producing it, but often make less of it as they age, which causes lactose intolerance the symptoms for this include nausea, bloating, and diarrhea to name a few. ThisRead MoreClassification of Macromolecules2186 Words   |  9 PagesABSTRACTThe purpose of this lab was to determine if various substances contained macromolecules, specifically; carbohydrates, proteins, or vitamin C. The tests used were the Biuret test, the xanthoproteic test, the Benedicts test, the starch test, and the indophenol test. Many of the substances were positive for that which they were being tested, proving the hypothesis partially correct. INTRODUCTIONThis lab was conducted to determine if various substances contained various macromolecules. TheRead MoreProkaryotic and Eukaryotic Cells Essay1028 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction In this lab, we observed different prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, and then we observed a termite gut to see the different unicellular microorganisms that it contained. The purpose of this lab is to observe living and prepared bacterial cells, then describe their morphology, observe and describe the primary features of the eukaryotic cell, and to investigate and observe the organisms involved in a symbiotic relationship. By observing these things, we are hoping to find out what weRead MoreBio Hackers : Saving The World !899 Words   |  4 Pagestomorrow. Bio-hackers are tinkering with the DNA of existing organisms to create new ones and will lead to innovations of a biological nature (Economist.com).Many of today’s innovators began as hackers in their garages or in temporary labs set up in a high school science lab. Innovators such as Thomas Edison, companies such as Hewlett-Packard and Google were hackers working in their garages or workshops. What positive changes will Bi o-hackers or innovators of today create for tomorrow? Bio-hackers areRead MoreGenetically Modified Animals : Ethical Or Should Be Legal1008 Words   |  5 PagesHeidi Ransford Mrs. Illingworth STEM Biology 17 March 2015 A Genetically Modified Animal is an animal that has had its genetic material altered â€Å"by adding, changing, or removing certain DNA sequences in a way that does not occur naturally.† (EFSA ‘Genetically Modified Organisms’) The goal of genetic modification is to change characteristics of an animal to introduce a new trait, such as growth-rate, quality of meat, milk composition, disease resistance, and survival. Genetically modified animalsRead MoreHow Heat Affects Lipase1180 Words   |  5 PagesFactors Affecting Enzyme Action ------------------------------------------------- Term 1 Biology Nicole Goosen Table of Contents Introduction: 3 Materials: 3 Method: 4 Risk assignment: 4 Risk: 4 Personal Protective Equipment: 4 Results: 5 Discussion: 5 Conclusion: 6 Introduction: How is the human body able to digest the food that you eat? How quickly your body digests your food? This is because the human body contains enzymes that are the biological substance, a.k.a proteinsRead MoreA Typical American Household s Shopping List Containing Milk And Other Dairy Based Products2013 Words   |  9 Pages A typical American household’s shopping list contains milk and other dairy based products. A lot of people cannot even start their day of without having milk. A typical person who has lived in US, and drinks milk on a daily basis probably believes that majority of the world’s population is also able to consume milk. However, research has shown that majority of the world’s population (70%)* is not able to digest milk. Milk contains a sugar called lactose. * Breakdown of lactose is the majorRead MoreEssay785 Words   |  4 Pagescollaborators. I also attended panel discussions with students and faculty of South Carolinas medical schools and biomedical graduate schools. This research investigated the microbial composition of various commercially available kefir (fermented milk) and homegrown kefir (produced from kefir grains) products. I conducted serial dilutions, microbial enumeration, streaking for isolation, gram staining, DNA extraction, amplification (PCR) and sequencing, bioinformatic analysis, and microbial identificationRead MoreWhy I Should Pursue A Career Field At The University Of The Sequoias823 Words   |  4 Pages when I questioned my mother why these fruits spoil, she responded it was due to â€Å"little bugs,† which was not a sufficient response. Thereafter, I decided to pursue a career in the biological sciences with an emphasis in Microbiology/Molecular Biology to further understand how postharvest diseases affect many crops, and why foodborne pathogens infect humans. While continuing my general education at the College of the Sequoias, I became involved in various clubs and organizations in my communityRead MoreBradford Protein Assay Essay803 Words   |  4 PagesAn Le Foundation Biology lab BRADFORD PROTEIN DISCUSSION ESSAY The appearance of blue color showed the present of protein in the BSA dilutions. The more diluted the solution was, the less blue it was. The R2 value of the standard curve of BSA dilution was obtained to be 0.9972, which is close to 1. The closer to 1 the R2 value was, the more accurate the linear portion was. The error percentage of each unknown was large: 25.9% for skim milk, 95% for soy sauce, and 64.7% for egg white. The vast

Can Failure Leads For Success Praise Of The F Word By...

Can failure leads to success? In Praise Of The F Word by Mary Sherry, she argues that flunking students will motivate students to do better in school. The idea that flunking students will help one success in school is a categorical false. Although some advocates might argue that flunking does encourage students to do better in school. These silly dreamers are too dogmatic in their ideology. The three examples that exemplify that fluking does not help the students success are cheating, drop out of school, and depression. Flunking students can make one cheat in school. Cheating happens a lot in school because most don’t get caught therefore, students don’t understand the consequences of cheating. According to Sherry, â€Å"Passing students who have not mastered the work, cheats them and the employers who expect graduates to have basic skills† (Sherry). Most employers expect graduates students to know the basic skills, but yet some don’t. Overall failure does not help students success in life. For example, I have witnessed my classmate cheat in math class. Some students blame that it’s hard to understand the teacher’s teaching skill therefore one needs to cheat. The point is many students does not take the initial to go to tutor. Cheating has bothered me, especially when one tried to study and the other don’t but still pass the class. In multiple test, a classmate who sat next to me always used one’s phone to google the answer or stared at my ans wer. Throughout the test, IShow MoreRelatedIn Praise Of The F Word By Mary Sherry Analysis1046 Words   |  5 PagesFailure to Success â€Å" In praise of the F word† by Mary Sherry, the author has her point that flunking students is a way that can help students do better in school. Flunking students can be helpful in getting them motivated and lead to success in their education. Students who don’t want to put in effort because they are lazy, a troublemaker, or good student that gets just passed along to next grade deserve to fail. Is it not going to be easy for students to be successful in their education. The studentsRead MoreAnswer: Paragraph and Thesis-and-support Outline Thesis9749 Words   |  39 Pagespeople turn away,† and so on. In the second sentence of paragraph 7, Gregory uses the metaphor of a flying eagle to represent the movement of money. (A picture of an eagle is engraved on one side of a quarter). 3. By using the exact words spoken by Helene, the teacher, and himself, Gregory gives a very clear picture of what happened by allowing the reader to â€Å"experience† it, rather than simply hear a general summary. The dialogue between Helene and the teacher shows Helene as an idealRead MoreAnswer: Paragraph and Thesis-and-support Outline Thesis9738 Words   |  39 Pagesturn away,† and so on. In the second sentence of paragraph 7, Gregory uses the metaphor of a flying eagle to represent the movement of money. (A picture of an eagle is engraved on one side of a quarter). 3. By using the exact words spoken by Helene, the teacher, and himself, Gregory gives a very clear picture of what happened by allowing the reader to â€Å"experience† it, rather than simply hear a general summary. The dialogue between Helene and the teacher shows Helene as an idealRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesOutcomes 25 Summary and Implications for Managers 30 S A L Self-Assessment Library How Much Do I Know About Organizational Behavior? 4 Myth or Science? â€Å"Most Acts of Workplace Bullying Are Men Attacking Women† 12 An Ethical Choice Can You Learn from Failure? 24 glOBalization! Does National Culture Affect Organizational Practices? 30 Point/Counterpoint Lost in Translation? 31 Questions for Review 32 Experiential Exercise Workforce Diversity 32 Ethical Dilemma Jekyll and Hyde 33 Case IncidentRead MoreHuman Resources Management150900 Words   |  604 Pagesprofessionals and operating managers must view HR management as an interface. Discuss why ethical issues and professionalism affect HR management as a career field. ââ€"  ââ€"  ââ€"  ââ€"  ââ€"  3 HR TRANSITIONS HR Management Contributes to Organizational Success More effective management of human resources (HR) increasingly is being seen as positively affecting performance in organizations, both large and small. A joint venture between General Electric and a Japanese company, GE Fanuc is a manufacturer of

Legal System and the Social Construction of Childhood Free Essays

In 1924 the League of Nations promulgated the first international agreement setting out the principles, which should inform the universal treatment of children. The underlying image of the child contained in the Declaration of Geneva was thoroughly imbued with a modernist concept of childhood. In particular children were seen as incomplete, non-social, weak and dependent. We will write a custom essay sample on Legal System and the Social Construction of Childhood or any similar topic only for you Order Now The Declaration, therefore, placed its emphasis on the duties of adults towards children. The UN Convention of the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), agreed in 1989, took this a stage further by making its provisions legally binding on national governments that ratified it. By 2003 this included all governments of the world except the US. The UNCRC, however, surpasses the modernist notion of children as a cultural other. It raises children’s social participation as a goal alongside protection and provision. Children’s participation has become an international rallying point for child advocacy. It is seen as capable of transcending differences in the social, cultural and economic conditions of children’s lives around the world (Davie, Upton and Varma, 1996; Flekkoy and Kaufman, 1997; Franklin, 1995; Hart, 1992; Lansdown, 1995). From one point of view the UNCRC represents a benign attempt to bring enlightenment and humane standards to all children. It has been used in this way and it is on these grounds that it draws enthusiastic support and even evokes a certain amount of zealotry. It has also been characterized as high in rhetoric but low in intensity. In this sense it is a highly suitable instrument through which declarations of lofty principle can be made but about which little needs to be done in practice. However, it is also the case that the children’s rights lobby is, for good or ill, on the forefront of the global spread of norms about childhood. As Boyden (1997:197) notes, these efforts have their precursors in the ‘civilizing mission’ of colonialism: â€Å"As the twentieth century has progressed, then, highly selective, stereo-typical perceptions of childhood – of the innocent child victim on the one hand and the young deviant on the other – have been exported from the industrial world to the South †¦ It has been the explicit goal of children’s rights specialists to crystallize in international law a universal system of rights for the child based on these norms.† The effects of this, she argues, are not always positive. Rights is a concept which is ultimately tied up with cultural values. Their successful implementation depends upon the existence of a compatible framework of meaning and an infrastructure of social and economic supports. The right to protection, for example, may translate well into practice when agencies, such as the police, are reliable upholders of law. When they are reliably corrupt it can be a recipe for oppression. Furthermore, some aspects of the concept of childhood contained in the UNCRC might also depend for their realization upon a level of economic wealth that many countries do not possess. As we have seen, for some countries international economic policy has led to deepening poverty, ill-health and inequality at the same time that social policy is urging the adoption of the rights of children. Perhaps, though, this is to underestimate the subtle processes that the UNCRC is enmeshed within. The different ways in which it (or part of it, Article 12) can be interpreted illustrate well how cultural globalization creates both diversity and homogeneity. It is, as Lee (1999) has pointed out, a document that has effectivity only because it is ambiguous. It is framed in such a way that its general principles are given a great deal of space for local interpretation. In fact, such was the level of disagreement among those who drafted it that this was the only way to make it acceptable to a wide range of countries with different cultural traditions about childhood. As Lee (2001a: 95-6) comments: â€Å"If the Convention had been intended to clarify children’s position, it would indeed crumple under this burden, but the Convention operates in a rather different way. Having generated childhood ambiguity, it then lays the responsibility for managing that ambiguity on the legislatures and the policy-makers of the states that have ratified it.† The representation of childhood found in the UNCRC has become more complex and ambiguous than the earlier Declaration. The protection and provision articles of the Convention still emphasize children’s need of adult support but, at the same time, especially through Article 12 of the Convention, children are pictured as social actors, not outside but inside society, not passive recipients but active participants. Role of the Legal System in Regulating children However, the contradictory effects of globalization do not all flow in the direction of self-expression and rights. From another point of view the twentieth century has witnessed increased levels of institutional control over children. The introduction of compulsory schooling and children’s formal exclusion from paid work signaled a historical tendency towards children’s increasing compartmentalization in specifically designated, separate settings, supervised by professionals and structured according to age and ability. Nà ¤sman (1994) has called this process the institutionalization of childhood. Throughout the twentieth century schooling has gradually been extended both ‘upwards’ (for example in incremental steps towards an older leaving-age for compulsory schooling) and ‘downwards’ in the growing emphasis on pre-school education and nursery provision (Moss et al., 2000.) Even leisure time is often framed in this way for many children because activities such as sport or music increasingly take place within some kind of institutional setting. It can be seen in the provision of after-school and holiday clubs that organize and regulate children’s activities under an adult gaze, channeling them into forms considered developmentally healthy and productive. Such phenomena have been noted across European societies. German sociologists, for example, have used the terms ‘domestication’ to describe the progressive removal of children from the streets and other public spaces and their relocation in special, protected spaces. They use the term ‘insularization’ to describe the decreased levels of children’s autonomous mobility around cities and the creation of special ‘islands’ of childhood to and from which they are transported (Zeiher, 2001, 2002). Within these institutions, but with significant variations according to national policy, it is possible to discern a struggle to tighten the regulation of children and to shape more firmly the outcomes of their activities. Schooling is a good example of this. In the last decades of the twentieth century the rather instrumental schooling regimes of the ‘Tiger Economies’ of Southeast Asia were held up as the model for producing economic efficiency and were widely influential in changing educational systems in Europe. I have argued elsewhere that this phenomenon represents a refocusing of modernity’s drive to control the future through children (Prout, 2000a). This tightening of control over children derives from a declining faith in other mechanisms of economic control, combined with increasing competitive pressures from the world economy. The intensification of global competition and the intricate networking of national economies erode the state’s capacity to control its own economic activity. In such circumstances, shaping children as the future labor force is seen as an increasingly important option. This, after all, is exactly what supply side economics is about but, as far as children are concerned, it often leads to attempts to regulate and standardize what they learn and how they learn it. References Boyden, J 1997, ‘Childhood and the Policy Makers’, in James, A and Prout, A (eds), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood (2nd edn), Falmer Press, London. Davie, R, Upton, G and Varma, V (eds) 1996, The Voice of the Child, Falmer Press, London. Flekkoy, GD and Kaufman, NH 1997, The Participation Rights of the Child: Rights and Responsibilities in Family and Society, Jessica Kingsley, London. Franklin, B 1995, Handbook of Children’s Rights: Comparative Policy and Practice, Routledge, London. Hart, R 1992, Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship, Innocenti Essays, Florence. Lansdown, G 1995, Taking Part: Children’s Participation in Decision Making, Institute for Public Policy Research, London. Lee, N 1999, ‘The Challenge of Childhood: The Distribution of Childhood’s Ambiguity in Adult Institutions’, Childhood, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 455-74. Lee, N 2001a, Childhood and Society: Growing Up in an Age of Uncertainty, Open University Press, Buckingham. Moss, P, Dillon, J and Statham, J 2000, ‘The â€Å"Child in Need† and â€Å"The Rich Child†: Discourses, Constructions and Practices’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 233-54. Nà ¤sman, E 1994, ‘Individualisation and Institutionalisation of Children’, in Qvortrup, J., Bardy, M., Sgritta, G. and Wintersberger, H. (eds), Childhood Matters: Social Theory, Practice and Politics, Avebury, Aldershot. Prout, A 2000a, ‘Control and Self-Realisation in Late Modern Childhoods’, Special Millenium Edition of Children and Society, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 304-15. Zeiher, H 2001, ‘Children’s Islands in Space and Time: The Impact of Spatial Differentiation on Children’s Ways of Shaping Social Life’, in du Bois-Reymond, M., Sunker, H. and Kruger, H.-H. (eds), Childhood in Europe: Approaches – Trends – Findings, Peter Lang, New York. Zeiher, H. (2002) ‘Shaping Daily Life in Urban Environments’, in Christensen, P. and O’Brien, M. (eds), Children in the City: Home, Neighbourhood and Community, London: Falmer Press.          How to cite Legal System and the Social Construction of Childhood, Essay examples

Reaction from the movie FROZEN free essay sample

â€Å"Frozen† was one of my favorite movies so far in my teenage life. It remains to be different from other movies that I had watched. Yes, most Disney movies are almost all about love, love and love for opposite genders but this movie is really not. I mean, it is about love but a kind of love that everyone else can ever be satisfied. This is about the love of a family specifically, the love a sister to another sister and this is what makes this kind of movie different from the rest. In this movie, I honestly became inspired not to crave for any boy and girl relationships. Actually, I never had one yet and do not plan to have one. It tells me that the love coming from my family is already enough for a teenager like me unless I became adult and can’t resist being in love in a person who I will think I am ready to get committed. We will write a custom essay sample on Reaction from the movie FROZEN or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Since I am referring to a love coming from my family or from my own sister, I will stick to this. Even the soundtracks of this movie made me say â€Å"I can relate in every lyrics sang. â€Å" I can say that this movie really stroked me based on what also happened to my sister and I a year ago. They said, it is normal to have fights with your siblings because we can never get away from problems and that became part of our lives. What happened was my sister and I had one fight that really changes everything about us. This is a kind of confidential story but I am willing to share a little. We grew up in different walls, I lived with my aunt since our mom left us and she lived with my grandmother for almost three to five years and went back to us when she reached sixth grade. Our house is not too far from the house where my grandmother lives. It was just like eight houses away from our house and we were just like neighbors. It’s just that sometimes during weekends; they are going to our house in the province. Everything was fine between us. We can still meet because were in the same school. The only thing that was different that time was our treatment of discipline. I was disciplined by my aunt and she was spoiled by my grandmother. Time came when she reached the sixth grade and she was with us already. She was okay and we are really in good vibes. Our fight was not just a fight or a normal fight of a sisterhood. Well, it was my fault of doing something like scold her and made her slept at the house of the Sisters of our school. Yes, she did not go home that time and yes, I was guilty of doing it. I tried sending her messages and apologies just to make her go home. I am guilty of scolding her and afraid what might happened to her. The next day came and I was the one who fetched her from the house of the Sisters. I confessed everything and made apologies to her. It took a lot of days for us to recover because when she went home, she was also scolded again by some people in our house which made me felt very guilty, afraid, and scared and a lot more synonyms of guilt. I was so sorry even I know she also had mistakes of not coming home but in my mind, I blamed myself. She also made apologies to me as I did and became friends or let say more than friends because we are sisters and even people will make our world upside down, we are still sisters. We shared love for each other and bonded a lot more and covered up the things we missed. This is why and how the movie â€Å"Frozen† stroked me. There was a part of the song â€Å"Do you wanna build a snowman? † that says â€Å"We only have each other, just you and me. What are we gonna do? † which really made me remembered everything. We don’t have our real parents with anymore so we only have each other whose going to be with each other no matter what. The story of â€Å"Frozen† is also about looking for a true love but it was the love of a sister to her sister that was true. We have to value and appreciate everything that our sister or even our brother is doing for us especially in our family’s case because at the very end, it will be just my sister and I.