A Dolls House, by Henry Ibsen Essay -- Henry Ibsen, A Doll House

I locate the allegorical implications specifically, very beneficial to the general plot, just as the incongruity that sets us up for tense circumstances in which any dramatization ought to do. Straightforwardly after the title of the dramatization, we are quickly prepared with the social gauges of the time as the principal character is recorded: â€Å"Torvald Helmer - a lawyer,† and underneath his name: â€Å"Nora - his wife.† She regardless of anything else is initial a spouse and a mother; these titles accept her essential obligations and duties. Nora anyway isn't significantly more than a â€Å"trophy wife† to Mr. Helmer and a mate to her youngsters. Torvald alludes to her with what appear to be corrupting scratch nding, a large number of ladies have (875). This announcement takes into consideration Nora to understand her numerous achievements and her value of a bigger honor than what she has ever been given. Torvald quits alluding to her utilizing flying crea ture illustrations, he presently observes her qualities that far surpass his own. Rather than her depending on him, he is needy upon all her his dearest open picture. Nora no longer depends on his cases of wide wings to protect you with, (871) she breaks free and uses her own as of late found wings to escape Torvald’s shielding. One all through the play is nearly seeking after the â€Å"greatest miracle,† yet can see Nora’s battle to break liberated from her confined jail. Nora has liberated herself to fly similarly as winged creatures were made to do, and the sound of an entryway pummeling shut underlines her picked up quality. Works Cited Ibsen, Henrik. A Doll House. 1983. Print.

The Intentional Death Of Francis Macomber Essay Example For Students

The Intentional Death Of Francis Macomber Essay Ernest Hemingway has made an artful culmination of secret in his storyThe Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber. The puzzle does notreveal itself to the peruser until the finish of the story, yet itleaves a great deal to the creative mind. Toward the finish of the storyMargaret Macomber murders her significant other coincidentally, so as to savehim from being destroyed by an enormous Buffalo while on a safari inAfrica. The puzzle is whether this murdering was trulyaccidental, or deliberate. If it somehow managed to be consideredintentional, there would surely must be proof in thestory proposing such, with a reasonable intention also. What makesthis puzzle remarkable is that Hemingway gives the peruser numerousinstances that would lead the peruser to devise an acceptablemotive, yet human instinct tells the peruser that this slaughtering couldnot have been purposeful. From a simply target examination of thestory, the peruser would see definitely more proof supporting thetheory of a deli berate murdering instead of an incidental one. We will compose a custom article on The Intentional Death Of Francis Macomber explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now The pieces of information supporting that Margaret murdered Francisintentionally can best be seen when watching and considering thebackground data on both Francis Macomber, and Margaretherself. (Hemingway 1402). What is additionally significant is that Margotand Francis have altogether different characters. This is clearlyseen when the storyteller states, (Hemingway 1402). With this modest quantity of foundation data, the genuine motivefor a purposeful slaughtering can be found. This can unmistakably be seenin the discussion of Francis Macomber in the wake of slaughtering the buffalowhen he states, (Hemingway 1408. (Hemingway 1409). Robert Wilson,the control on the chase, gives the peruser an outside perspectiveinto this intricate and pained relationship. In light of thequote above Hemingway 1409). Robert Wilson is by all accounts directly in his depictions of the couple,and their relationship all through the story. On the off chance that this is valid, andnone of his assumptions about the couple are bogus, at that point he gainsmore believability towards the finish of the story. It is at this pointthat he turns into the supporter of Margot activities, regardless of the factthat they were purposeful. It is Wilson that gives the peruser thebest depiction of the connection among Francis and his significant other. It is his knowledge into Margot, notwithstanding, that is the most detailed,and which implies that she may be able to do such anact. From this shrewd examination of the two, Wilson shows the readerseveral significant things. One is the reality, in spite of the fact that somewhatmachiavellian, that over her significant other. Another perception that Isomewhat significant is the This is the pitilessness that Wilson observesin the entry above.This, as she would before long observe, was not thecase. One of the most significant entries in the story happens in themoments not long before Francis and Robert Wilson go into the bushafter the wild ox. After Margot shoot the deadly shot, furtherevidence is given by Robert Wilson that bolsters the assertionthat the slaughtering was purposeful Hemingway 1411). Wilson, whoseems to be precise in his evaluation of the relationship, seemsa sound observer to the executing and because of these realities, hisopinion with respect to the intention of the murdering is trustworthy to the readeras well.. story. From the entirety of the proof given in the story, and from an objectiveanalysis of the discussion and portrayal, it is protected to maketheassumption that the killings were to be sure purposeful. There issimply insufficient substantial proof given in the discussion ornarration that would recommend in any case declaration. A CharacterAnalysis of Francis Macomber From Hemingways The Short HappyLife of Francis MacomberIn Hemingways The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber, theauthor shows his verifiable capacity to bring characters tolife by presenting the peruser in extraordinary detail to the maincharacter, Francis Macomber, through shifting abstract instruments. .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .postImageUrl , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .focused content region { min-tallness: 80px; position: relative; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:hover , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:visited , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:active { border:0!important; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .clearfix:after { content: ; show: table; clear: both; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e { show: square; progress: foundation shading 250ms; webkit-change: foundation shading 250ms; width: 100%; darkness: 1; progress: haziness 250ms; webkit-change: murkiness 250ms; foundation shading: #95A5A6; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:active , .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:hover { obscurity: 1; progress: mistiness 250ms; webkit-change: darkness 250ms; foundation shading: #2C3E50; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .focused content region { width: 100%; position: relativ e; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .ctaText { outskirt base: 0 strong #fff; shading: #2980B9; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: intense; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; content enhancement: underline; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .postTitle { shading: #FFFFFF; text dimension: 16px; text style weight: 600; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; width: 100%; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e .ctaButton { foundation shading: #7F8C8D!important; shading: #2980B9; fringe: none; fringe sweep: 3px; box-shadow: none; text dimension: 14px; textual style weight: striking; line-stature: 26px; moz-fringe span: 3px; content adjust: focus; content embellishment: none; content shadow: none; width: 80px; min-stature: 80px; foundation: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/modules/intelly-related-posts/resources/pictures/basic arrow.png)no-rehash; position: outright; right: 0; top: 0; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:hover .ctaButton { foundation shading: #34495E!important; } .u9662f0feefeb0 7e80b658c3ec522896e .focused content { show: table; stature: 80px; cushioning left: 18px; top: 0; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e-content { show: table-cell; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; cushioning right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-adjust: center; width: 100%; } .u9662f0feefeb07e80b658c3ec522896e:after { content: ; show: square; clear: both; } READ: BSAD 18/118 - Business Law EssayThe peruser learns colossal insight concerning Francis, just as theother two essential characters, Margaret and Mr.Wilson, throughcreative depiction that incorporates every character thoughts,their activities, and their responses towards the occasions of thestory. Francis Macombers inside attributes and impressionsare uncovered through such omniscient explanations as:In expansion, more subtleties are uncovered about the character ofFrancis through the other chief characters and even throughthe characters who assume a little job in the story (e.g., thegun-bearers). For instance, (p 250). By methods for a blend ofthis kind of data, Francis Macombers character is changeddue to steady maltreatment from different characters, an inward strugglewith dread and humiliation, and, in the long run, by scorn a deephatred for Mr. Wilson and a fairly calmer contempt for MargaretMacomber. An underlying reason in the last changes of Francis character canbe credited to the consistent maltreatment endured on account of hiswife, and, quickly, by Mr. WilsonFor model, in p 259. Francisand Margaret have clearly arrived at a state of stagnation-stagnation in their affections for one another and stagnation intheir want for the relationship. The consideration from societypress (and society individuals), talked about in p 237-p 238, is all the more thanlikely an extra main impetus for Margaret too. Thereader gets the feeling that she needs the consideration, good,bad, or detached. Howeverhe shows weakness without fearof regret from his better half. Nonetheless, the regret hehimself, somewhere inside, feels, that starts to turn Mr. Macomberaround. Also, Mr. Wilson additionally adds to thiscompounding misuse. Despite the fact that, generally, Mr. Wilsons emotions areperceivably kept inside the limits of his own brain, the effectsof these considerations despite everything exists. To outline, in p 54, Mr. Wilsonis contemplating internally, So hes a ridiculous four-letter man as wellas a wicked defeatist. I rather enjoyed him too until today. As thereader advances through the story, clearly theabusive comments, contemplations, and activities of Mr. Wilson, andespecially those of Margaret, are focal factors in contributingto the progressions that occur in the character of FrancisMacomber. Francis winds up battling with dread and humiliation fromthe beginning of the story, despite the fact that the subtleties of the underlying fearare uncovered to the peruser to some degree later. This interior strugglewith dread and shame is a central factor in hissubsequent change. Hemingway places the peruser in a positionto settle on choices about the impacts of the beforehand discussedabuse as it identifies with Francis inward fight with dread andembarrassment. Obviously these emotions assume a key job in thedevelopment of the character, yet this maltreatment likewise raises a fewquestions. Is Macomber influenced enough by the humiliation andthe dread brought about by the scene with the lion (p 168-p 229) to makethis last change? Is the occurrence with the lion in thebush the contributing variable to Francis profound established changes? No,if it were that straightforward, Hemingway would have prevailing in creatinga rather slow story. To refer to an occurrence, in p 89. Likewise, laterin the story, Mr. Wilson contributes ostensibly to Francisfeelings of humiliation by bedding Margaret. In this capacity,Mr. Wilson causes Francis to endure the best embarrassmentthat a man can persevere. And afterward Mr. Wilson scoured salt into thewound by noting Topping to Francis investigation into the state ofhis earlier evenings rest (p 269). Doubtlessly, the episode with thelion caused an unbelievable dread mind

Condescension in the Ranks How to Handle Snide Remarks at Work

Condescension in the Ranks How to Handle Snide Remarks at Work One of the biggest characteristics a workplace must have is harmony among the workers so that it can be a healthy and productive work environment.Unfortunately, sometimes some colleagues know to throw a remark or two on your way for various reasons.Condescending work colleagues who are persistent in their snide remarks are the basic example of harmful work behavior.There is a big difference between a witty comment that is occasionally brought up in order to lighten up the atmosphere and consistently harmful comments that get you off your balance.Being a target of a snide remark is nothing new, it has, actually, become a mundane and everyday experience.Have in mind that throwing a couple of snide remarks among friends is a normal thing, however, if you are not well acquainted with the colleague or colleagues at work that constantly annoy you with their remarks, then it might be a problem.In further writing of the text, you will learn what are some of the ways you can use that can help you in handling snide remarks, how you can show yourself as an emotionally strong person so that people avoid throwing snarky remarks at you, etc.By the end of the article, you will be able to read a brief psychological insight into why people use snide remarks and what do they want to achieve by using them at their workplaces.GIVE THE COLLEAGUE THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBTThis is the first logical step that one takes when a snide remark is made about them.This applies if the colleague in question is throwing a snide remark at you for the first time.Just give that colleague the benefit of the doubt. They might have been nervous and it might have slipped up accidentally.Using sarcastic comments and similar snide remarks is a common way of showing that the person is just trying to be friends with you.It does not mean that they are doing it on purpose. It is the same as if someone you smile at does not return the smile, and you automatically assume that they are rude.Before doing anything always consider the intention of the comment, because maybe the comment was not of mean nature but a sign of a friendly teasing nature.You should try this way in order to avoid escalation of the situation. In other words, you could make an elephant out of a fly and further decrease the quality of the working atmosphere in your office, if it was just a witty, one-time remark.AVOID THE COLLEAGUEAvoiding the colleague is a useful step but it is not one that is always plausible. If the snide remarks really get under your skin, you can always try to avoid the colleague.The problem arises if that colleague is an important person that crosses paths with you daily.This step would not help you in the long run because it will give confirmation to the colleague that the snide remarks get to you and that you will only run if met with snide remarks.Even though avoiding the colleague could sound like the only option in the heat of the moment, the only situation where avoiding the colleague can w ork is if you are employed somewhere where you do not plan on staying for some extended period.In addition, if your work results would not be affected by your choice to avoid the colleague whose snide remarks are bothering you, then it can also be a good idea to avoid them.If you plan on sticking longer on that job position, then it might be a good idea to consider some other ways of handling snide remarks.Even though it is not a good way to handle a colleague who is bothering you with their remarks, it is still a possible way that can be considered. COMPLETELY IGNORE THE COLLEAGUEThis one is a bit similar to the previous entry but it has a major difference.If a colleagues remarks are really getting under your skin, you can try and completely ignore them.The ramifications are similar to the previous entry: it might affect the working atmosphere and it might affect the work projects that you two share if you do share some at all.One of the major differences is that you actually confr ont the colleague that is bothering you, in a way.If the colleague sees that you are completely ignoring, not only their snide remarks but also their legitimate questions, they might suspect something is wrong between the two of you and issue a conversation to see what is going on.After talking, you can start with a clean slate.The main idea with this entry is to show the colleague that is bothering you that you do not like the snide comments they are throwing at you and, at the same time, show them that you can give minimal to no attention to them as a form of retaliation.It might be seen as a childish move, but so are the constant remarks that they are directing to you.ANALYZE THE SITUATION AND THE REMARK DIRECTED AT YOUThis entry is one of the interesting ones, as it involves evaluating oneself.First things first, the analysis of the situation means that you should ask yourself in what situation were the two of you when the remark was tossed at you.If it was a situation closely l inked with a particular work project or a characteristic that you have, for example, chewing loudly while at the break room, then it was a slight critique of you disguised as a remark.The remark itself would serve as a direct explanation of that characteristic and why it must be changed.This one is one of the deeper and philosophical entries in this article because it basically tells you to look beyond the snide comment and find the inner core and meaning of the comment in order to help you.Of course, not every snide remark will be a call to better yourself. You can always try and seek the deeper meaning behind the remark.This entry cannot be seen as a way to stop the snide remarks made by the colleague, but as a way to employ your brain to not look at them as a shallow way to make a quick laugh, but as a critique to improve over that characteristic that has been ridiculed through self-improvement, which is one of the most important things that one could do.You know that old phrase that says there is a grain of truth in every joke? Well ask yourself if the snide remarks youre faced with holds that grain of truth or more.This is an interesting entry that you can use because it actually can help you analyze yourself and help you think more about your strengths and weaknesses rather than the snide remark that might have hurt your feelings.There are no negative aspects in the workplace, except that the colleague might continue messing with you with the snide remarks, however, you might better yourself so much that, in the end, the colleague will run out of material.The point of the analysis is to critically assess what youre facing. Critically means youll try to be objective and neutral as you can and that means that youll clear all vanity out of the way.That in itself is helpful.DO NOT SHOW THAT IT GETS TO YOUThis one is indisputably the hardest entry on this list to achieve.There is a certain amount of negativity and nuisance a person can take before they burst. It is important to know that the colleagues or people who regularly toss around snide remarks aimed at you have the goal of seeing you annoyed.Possessing that knowledge, you can turn the stunt on its head by showing that you do not care about the snide remarks and that they simply do not get to you, at all.There are a few ways to focus your mind away from the person in mind, such as anchoring on a word in your mind until your anger passes, and regularly resting to balance your emotional stability.This entry might prove to be difficult for some people who have a tendency to get angry easily.The people with a short fuse or tendency to let other people get under their skin easily might have problems with this one due to their explosive nature.In that case, it is for the best to read on some techniques on how to relax in a situation that triggers your anger before you look up some ways of handling snide remarks.If you are a member of the infamous club of a short temper, this article mig ht be an interesting read t you.All in all, this way of handling the snide remarks might be more difficult for some people, but it is actually an easy way to keep the working atmosphere in the office and show the colleagues that by not showing that the snide remarks are bothering you enough to show any emotion, you are not the target they are looking for.BE KIND TO THE PROBLEMATIC COLLEAGUEThis one is the ultimate empathic approach. If the colleague is constantly spewing snide remarks about you, one of the interesting approaches is to be really kind to them.There are many benefits to becoming a kind person, one of them being the kindness boomerang. By being kind to him, you are showing that you do not care for the snide remarks they are making about you, and you might inspire him to be kind, as well.Being kind primarily improves your mental state and it might help you more than just handling a snide remark.Actually, empathy is a really important trait in the workplace as it enforces a positive increase in the atmosphere, thus, further increasing productivity.Being kind to the colleague who is getting under your skin is a good way to make him stop using the snide remarks, and is really a simple rule to follow: forgive them and be happy! Source: tutsplus.comTRY TO ESCAPE THE SITUATIONWhen in a workplace, one of the easiest ways to handle the snide remark or, if you see one incoming, avoid it completely.An example of the situation could be this: you see a colleague coming into the break room or your cubicle, or office.Then, when the colleague starts talking, if you see that they are going for a snide remark, look at the clock and say that you have to go do something. Easy as that.Basically, if you know that that one colleague will always try to be funny by getting under your skin, you can always find a way to get out of the room and tell that you have work to do.This entry is actually very similar to the avoiding the colleague entry, the only difference being that, in this case, you are confronting the witty colleague and snuffing them out before they start talking.This is a way to handle the incoming snide remarks but the only disadvantage is that you might cut off the person that might tell you something work-relate d.This can be used for serial snide remarkers, and should be used only if you are absolutely sure that that colleague will not say anything important or productive to you.TALK TO THE COLLEAGUE ABOUT ITTalking to the colleague that is bombarding you with snide remarks is one of the most important things to do, sooner or later.It is important to express yourself and explain to them that their remarks annoy you and that they should stop.Now, there are three ways to talk to the colleague.The first way is to talk to them privately.Simple one on one talk, where you explain the situation to them, explain that you are not comfortable with the remarks and that you do not find them funny.This is the most civilized way to snuff out the situation and continue with your work.The second way of talking is to talk to them on the spot, just after them saying the snide remark.This one is tricky because, for a short-tempered person, the stuff that can come out of their mouth in the heat of the moment might not be something that they are going to proudly retell later.On the other hand, you will come out as a person who does not like being pushed around and annoyed, so you might earn your colleagues respect.It is an interesting way to confront the colleague and their snide remark, but at the same time, this type of confrontation might prove to be a double-edged sword.The third and final way of handling the remark with a conversation is to jokingly confront the colleague with a snide remark of your own.This one can be a tricky road, as you might be stuck in a perpetual competition of who thinks of a better or funnier remark if that colleague is persistent.Even though it sounds childish, it is a way to try and make up a better and funnier remark than them, after which they might stop.It is a strange and childish way to try and handle the remark and the colleague that makes it, however, out of all the three aforementioned ways of talking, it is the one that has the least chance of wo rking.It is important to talk to your colleagues, no matter the circumstances, as you promote open-mindedness and communication with them, which is an important trait for a workplace and colleagues to have.For a person engaged in work, workspace atmosphere is one of the most important aspects of the workplace. Source: researchgate.netIn this part of the text, some reasons and mental profiles for such behavior will be covered in short, and how you can help yourself mentally, in order to deflect those or any other similar remarks easily.First of all, it is really difficult to stick a characteristic on a person that is throwing a snide remark at somebody. Is the person considered being a bully? Or being a mean person?That depends on the nature and frequency of the remarks.If we put a fusion of a bully mindset and a mean mindset into one and surround it with a workplace coat, it can be suggested that the person has been an object of other peoples remarks in their early career or previous jobs.The combination of having been taught to behave like that on their previous workplaces and other factors, for example, the need to be liked, having a big ego, seeing you as being different, are all the prime characteristics of a bully.Of course, being a part of the adult world, it is much easier to talk w ith that colleague that is bothering you, as you all share a common goal in the office.Having said all that, it might possibly be a silly joke that the person uses to connect with other people, as some believe that people often use snide remarks to make themselves look funny and break the ice or relax the situation.Of course, they can get out of line, but the golden rule to follow is for both parties to know when to speak and when to be silent.Secondly, if you have a bit of a shorter fuse than other people, or simply cannot let go if someone is messing with you, in an emotional sense, there are a few things you can do to strengthen psychologically.Firstly, you should focus your thoughts on bright thoughts, on places, people, and objects that inspire you. One should learn to not let a person dictate ones thoughts.Whenever you see the colleague or just any other person that knows how to get under your skin, be ready for their type of action that targets you and show them that it does not bother you anymore.You have greater goals that will require iron will and full attention so that snide remark is just too small to deter you away from your charted goal.Secondly, do not show the victim traits, even if you are one, in their eyes. The person is throwing the snide remarks in your face for their own selfish reasons, so do not give them the satisfaction of showing that it got to you.Even after a while, you should not think about the remark and whether you have done something wrong. Throw those negative feelings and thoughts out the window and focus on your goals, achievements, and inspirations.Finally, there are many ways to strengthen your mental state, for example, deep self-evaluation and progress reflection, if you are interested in reading a detailed explanation, here is an interesting article, in addition to a speech by Amy Morin, a psychotherapist whose expertise is giving advice regarding mental health. ASSERTIVE COMMUNICATIONNow the key thing here is asserti ve communication which basically means youll state the problem without adding oil to the fire.You will take a stance and confront a passive-aggressive colleague, but you wont verbally attack him, nor you will show that his/her comment got to you.You will either address their claim or them in person and expose the convo for what it is verbal aggression.The thing here is that people who are passive-aggressive opt for passivity because theyre afraid of aggression in the open or because they enjoy seeing you confused about the nature of your relationship and downright scared of the thing they may say next.The important thing to do is face them head-on and show them that you are not afraid and that youre a force to be reckoned with. You don’t do that by displaying aggressive behavior yourself because aggression is actually a sign of weakness.You remain calm, analyze their behavior and their potential motives and in a very serene tone, cut the whole thing at its core.Or just use sarcas m, thats what really gets on their nerves as well.CONCLUSIONIn conclusion, the working atmosphere is essential for a workplace to be seen as a productive and healthy work environment.Even though there are always jokers around every office, there is a thin line between saying a witty and funny comment and throwing a snide remark.Have in mind, that it is simply in some peoples nature to joke around by throwing snide remarks, one should always take it as such if the problem does not continue.Be aware that it all depends on your mentality. If you are easy to forgive and not easily let people get under your skin, you are at a greater advantage than the people who cannot emotionally withstand those kinds of attacks with ease.If you are one of the people that cannot easily let go of the snide remarks directed at them, just remember the ways of handling those snide remarks that have been mentioned in the text, and the ways you can exercise your mind to be more resilient to those snide remar ks that are thrown at you.All in all, it is important to understand that there are people and there will always be people who simply enjoy throwing snide remarks at their colleagues, friends or family, and the best possible option is to simply accept them and learn how to handle their snide remarks.

Essay about Biology Milk Lab - 1303 Words

Bonnie Bell Mrs. Legary Biology P.6 21, Sept. 2011 Milk Lab Final This investigation consists of testing the reaction between milk, food coloring, and dishwashing soap. Different kinds of milk were tested, depending on the amount of milk fat content. The investigation was based on 2 questions. Lab one’s problem statement, using only milk fat and food coloring was: How does food coloring react in different kinds of milk fat? The second lab’s problem statement, using milk fat, food coloring, and dishwashing soap was: What happens when detergent is added to different milk fats and food coloring? The expectation is that the milk with higher fat content will have a more dramatic reaction. If the milk has a higher fat content,†¦show more content†¦| The first table shows the results between the milk and food coloring. In milk fat 1, the red food coloring spread fast and wide. In milk fat 2, the red food coloring did the same as milk fat 1. In milk fat 3, the red food coloring spread slowly in an oval shape. In milk fat 4, the red food coloring didn’t expand very big. In milk fat 1, the blue food coloring expanded slowly for a long time and stayed dark blue. In milk fat 2, the blue food coloring spread fast for a long time and stayed in one big glob. In milk fat 3, the blue food coloring looked like a spider web. It starts out light in color and expanded slowly getting darker. In milk fat 4, the blue food coloring got gets lighter as it expands. In milk fat 1, the yellow food coloring was more spread out. In milk fat 2, the yellow food coloring stayed in a little circle. In milk fat 3, the yellow food coloring stayed in a little circle and turned to an orangish-yellow color. In milk fat 4, the yellow food coloring stayed i n a small spot and didn’t spread. In milk fat 1, the green food coloring spread fast but not very big. In milk fat 2, the green food coloring didn’t spread very big. In milk fat 3, the green food coloring spread pretty big. And in milk fat 4, the green food coloring spread quickly. Day 2 dataShow MoreRelatedEnzyme Lab Report Essay2194 Words   |  9 Pagesonly work when a particular substrate fits in their active site. An active site is â€Å"a region on the surface of an enzyme where the substrate binds, and where the reaction occurs†[2]. â€Å"Lactase is an enzyme that breaks down lactose, the sugar in milk. It is produced by the cells lining of the small intestine. Most people are born producing it, but often make less of it as they age, which causes lactose intolerance the symptoms for this include nausea, bloating, and diarrhea to name a few. ThisRead MoreClassification of Macromolecules2186 Words   |  9 PagesABSTRACTThe purpose of this lab was to determine if various substances contained macromolecules, specifically; carbohydrates, proteins, or vitamin C. The tests used were the Biuret test, the xanthoproteic test, the Benedicts test, the starch test, and the indophenol test. Many of the substances were positive for that which they were being tested, proving the hypothesis partially correct. INTRODUCTIONThis lab was conducted to determine if various substances contained various macromolecules. TheRead MoreProkaryotic and Eukaryotic Cells Essay1028 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction In this lab, we observed different prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, and then we observed a termite gut to see the different unicellular microorganisms that it contained. The purpose of this lab is to observe living and prepared bacterial cells, then describe their morphology, observe and describe the primary features of the eukaryotic cell, and to investigate and observe the organisms involved in a symbiotic relationship. By observing these things, we are hoping to find out what weRead MoreBio Hackers : Saving The World !899 Words   |  4 Pagestomorrow. Bio-hackers are tinkering with the DNA of existing organisms to create new ones and will lead to innovations of a biological nature (Economist.com).Many of today’s innovators began as hackers in their garages or in temporary labs set up in a high school science lab. Innovators such as Thomas Edison, companies such as Hewlett-Packard and Google were hackers working in their garages or workshops. What positive changes will Bi o-hackers or innovators of today create for tomorrow? Bio-hackers areRead MoreGenetically Modified Animals : Ethical Or Should Be Legal1008 Words   |  5 PagesHeidi Ransford Mrs. Illingworth STEM Biology 17 March 2015 A Genetically Modified Animal is an animal that has had its genetic material altered â€Å"by adding, changing, or removing certain DNA sequences in a way that does not occur naturally.† (EFSA ‘Genetically Modified Organisms’) The goal of genetic modification is to change characteristics of an animal to introduce a new trait, such as growth-rate, quality of meat, milk composition, disease resistance, and survival. Genetically modified animalsRead MoreHow Heat Affects Lipase1180 Words   |  5 PagesFactors Affecting Enzyme Action ------------------------------------------------- Term 1 Biology Nicole Goosen Table of Contents Introduction: 3 Materials: 3 Method: 4 Risk assignment: 4 Risk: 4 Personal Protective Equipment: 4 Results: 5 Discussion: 5 Conclusion: 6 Introduction: How is the human body able to digest the food that you eat? How quickly your body digests your food? This is because the human body contains enzymes that are the biological substance, a.k.a proteinsRead MoreA Typical American Household s Shopping List Containing Milk And Other Dairy Based Products2013 Words   |  9 Pages A typical American household’s shopping list contains milk and other dairy based products. A lot of people cannot even start their day of without having milk. A typical person who has lived in US, and drinks milk on a daily basis probably believes that majority of the world’s population is also able to consume milk. However, research has shown that majority of the world’s population (70%)* is not able to digest milk. Milk contains a sugar called lactose. * Breakdown of lactose is the majorRead MoreEssay785 Words   |  4 Pagescollaborators. I also attended panel discussions with students and faculty of South Carolinas medical schools and biomedical graduate schools. This research investigated the microbial composition of various commercially available kefir (fermented milk) and homegrown kefir (produced from kefir grains) products. I conducted serial dilutions, microbial enumeration, streaking for isolation, gram staining, DNA extraction, amplification (PCR) and sequencing, bioinformatic analysis, and microbial identificationRead MoreWhy I Should Pursue A Career Field At The University Of The Sequoias823 Words   |  4 Pages when I questioned my mother why these fruits spoil, she responded it was due to â€Å"little bugs,† which was not a sufficient response. Thereafter, I decided to pursue a career in the biological sciences with an emphasis in Microbiology/Molecular Biology to further understand how postharvest diseases affect many crops, and why foodborne pathogens infect humans. While continuing my general education at the College of the Sequoias, I became involved in various clubs and organizations in my communityRead MoreBradford Protein Assay Essay803 Words   |  4 PagesAn Le Foundation Biology lab BRADFORD PROTEIN DISCUSSION ESSAY The appearance of blue color showed the present of protein in the BSA dilutions. The more diluted the solution was, the less blue it was. The R2 value of the standard curve of BSA dilution was obtained to be 0.9972, which is close to 1. The closer to 1 the R2 value was, the more accurate the linear portion was. The error percentage of each unknown was large: 25.9% for skim milk, 95% for soy sauce, and 64.7% for egg white. The vast

Can Failure Leads For Success Praise Of The F Word By...

Can failure leads to success? In Praise Of The F Word by Mary Sherry, she argues that flunking students will motivate students to do better in school. The idea that flunking students will help one success in school is a categorical false. Although some advocates might argue that flunking does encourage students to do better in school. These silly dreamers are too dogmatic in their ideology. The three examples that exemplify that fluking does not help the students success are cheating, drop out of school, and depression. Flunking students can make one cheat in school. Cheating happens a lot in school because most don’t get caught therefore, students don’t understand the consequences of cheating. According to Sherry, â€Å"Passing students who have not mastered the work, cheats them and the employers who expect graduates to have basic skills† (Sherry). Most employers expect graduates students to know the basic skills, but yet some don’t. Overall failure does not help students success in life. For example, I have witnessed my classmate cheat in math class. Some students blame that it’s hard to understand the teacher’s teaching skill therefore one needs to cheat. The point is many students does not take the initial to go to tutor. Cheating has bothered me, especially when one tried to study and the other don’t but still pass the class. In multiple test, a classmate who sat next to me always used one’s phone to google the answer or stared at my ans wer. Throughout the test, IShow MoreRelatedIn Praise Of The F Word By Mary Sherry Analysis1046 Words   |  5 PagesFailure to Success â€Å" In praise of the F word† by Mary Sherry, the author has her point that flunking students is a way that can help students do better in school. Flunking students can be helpful in getting them motivated and lead to success in their education. Students who don’t want to put in effort because they are lazy, a troublemaker, or good student that gets just passed along to next grade deserve to fail. Is it not going to be easy for students to be successful in their education. The studentsRead MoreAnswer: Paragraph and Thesis-and-support Outline Thesis9749 Words   |  39 Pagespeople turn away,† and so on. In the second sentence of paragraph 7, Gregory uses the metaphor of a flying eagle to represent the movement of money. (A picture of an eagle is engraved on one side of a quarter). 3. By using the exact words spoken by Helene, the teacher, and himself, Gregory gives a very clear picture of what happened by allowing the reader to â€Å"experience† it, rather than simply hear a general summary. The dialogue between Helene and the teacher shows Helene as an idealRead MoreAnswer: Paragraph and Thesis-and-support Outline Thesis9738 Words   |  39 Pagesturn away,† and so on. In the second sentence of paragraph 7, Gregory uses the metaphor of a flying eagle to represent the movement of money. (A picture of an eagle is engraved on one side of a quarter). 3. By using the exact words spoken by Helene, the teacher, and himself, Gregory gives a very clear picture of what happened by allowing the reader to â€Å"experience† it, rather than simply hear a general summary. The dialogue between Helene and the teacher shows Helene as an idealRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesOutcomes 25 Summary and Implications for Managers 30 S A L Self-Assessment Library How Much Do I Know About Organizational Behavior? 4 Myth or Science? â€Å"Most Acts of Workplace Bullying Are Men Attacking Women† 12 An Ethical Choice Can You Learn from Failure? 24 glOBalization! Does National Culture Affect Organizational Practices? 30 Point/Counterpoint Lost in Translation? 31 Questions for Review 32 Experiential Exercise Workforce Diversity 32 Ethical Dilemma Jekyll and Hyde 33 Case IncidentRead MoreHuman Resources Management150900 Words   |  604 Pagesprofessionals and operating managers must view HR management as an interface. Discuss why ethical issues and professionalism affect HR management as a career field. ââ€"  ââ€"  ââ€"  ââ€"  ââ€"  3 HR TRANSITIONS HR Management Contributes to Organizational Success More effective management of human resources (HR) increasingly is being seen as positively affecting performance in organizations, both large and small. A joint venture between General Electric and a Japanese company, GE Fanuc is a manufacturer of

Legal System and the Social Construction of Childhood Free Essays

In 1924 the League of Nations promulgated the first international agreement setting out the principles, which should inform the universal treatment of children. The underlying image of the child contained in the Declaration of Geneva was thoroughly imbued with a modernist concept of childhood. In particular children were seen as incomplete, non-social, weak and dependent. We will write a custom essay sample on Legal System and the Social Construction of Childhood or any similar topic only for you Order Now The Declaration, therefore, placed its emphasis on the duties of adults towards children. The UN Convention of the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), agreed in 1989, took this a stage further by making its provisions legally binding on national governments that ratified it. By 2003 this included all governments of the world except the US. The UNCRC, however, surpasses the modernist notion of children as a cultural other. It raises children’s social participation as a goal alongside protection and provision. Children’s participation has become an international rallying point for child advocacy. It is seen as capable of transcending differences in the social, cultural and economic conditions of children’s lives around the world (Davie, Upton and Varma, 1996; Flekkoy and Kaufman, 1997; Franklin, 1995; Hart, 1992; Lansdown, 1995). From one point of view the UNCRC represents a benign attempt to bring enlightenment and humane standards to all children. It has been used in this way and it is on these grounds that it draws enthusiastic support and even evokes a certain amount of zealotry. It has also been characterized as high in rhetoric but low in intensity. In this sense it is a highly suitable instrument through which declarations of lofty principle can be made but about which little needs to be done in practice. However, it is also the case that the children’s rights lobby is, for good or ill, on the forefront of the global spread of norms about childhood. As Boyden (1997:197) notes, these efforts have their precursors in the ‘civilizing mission’ of colonialism: â€Å"As the twentieth century has progressed, then, highly selective, stereo-typical perceptions of childhood – of the innocent child victim on the one hand and the young deviant on the other – have been exported from the industrial world to the South †¦ It has been the explicit goal of children’s rights specialists to crystallize in international law a universal system of rights for the child based on these norms.† The effects of this, she argues, are not always positive. Rights is a concept which is ultimately tied up with cultural values. Their successful implementation depends upon the existence of a compatible framework of meaning and an infrastructure of social and economic supports. The right to protection, for example, may translate well into practice when agencies, such as the police, are reliable upholders of law. When they are reliably corrupt it can be a recipe for oppression. Furthermore, some aspects of the concept of childhood contained in the UNCRC might also depend for their realization upon a level of economic wealth that many countries do not possess. As we have seen, for some countries international economic policy has led to deepening poverty, ill-health and inequality at the same time that social policy is urging the adoption of the rights of children. Perhaps, though, this is to underestimate the subtle processes that the UNCRC is enmeshed within. The different ways in which it (or part of it, Article 12) can be interpreted illustrate well how cultural globalization creates both diversity and homogeneity. It is, as Lee (1999) has pointed out, a document that has effectivity only because it is ambiguous. It is framed in such a way that its general principles are given a great deal of space for local interpretation. In fact, such was the level of disagreement among those who drafted it that this was the only way to make it acceptable to a wide range of countries with different cultural traditions about childhood. As Lee (2001a: 95-6) comments: â€Å"If the Convention had been intended to clarify children’s position, it would indeed crumple under this burden, but the Convention operates in a rather different way. Having generated childhood ambiguity, it then lays the responsibility for managing that ambiguity on the legislatures and the policy-makers of the states that have ratified it.† The representation of childhood found in the UNCRC has become more complex and ambiguous than the earlier Declaration. The protection and provision articles of the Convention still emphasize children’s need of adult support but, at the same time, especially through Article 12 of the Convention, children are pictured as social actors, not outside but inside society, not passive recipients but active participants. Role of the Legal System in Regulating children However, the contradictory effects of globalization do not all flow in the direction of self-expression and rights. From another point of view the twentieth century has witnessed increased levels of institutional control over children. The introduction of compulsory schooling and children’s formal exclusion from paid work signaled a historical tendency towards children’s increasing compartmentalization in specifically designated, separate settings, supervised by professionals and structured according to age and ability. Nà ¤sman (1994) has called this process the institutionalization of childhood. Throughout the twentieth century schooling has gradually been extended both ‘upwards’ (for example in incremental steps towards an older leaving-age for compulsory schooling) and ‘downwards’ in the growing emphasis on pre-school education and nursery provision (Moss et al., 2000.) Even leisure time is often framed in this way for many children because activities such as sport or music increasingly take place within some kind of institutional setting. It can be seen in the provision of after-school and holiday clubs that organize and regulate children’s activities under an adult gaze, channeling them into forms considered developmentally healthy and productive. Such phenomena have been noted across European societies. German sociologists, for example, have used the terms ‘domestication’ to describe the progressive removal of children from the streets and other public spaces and their relocation in special, protected spaces. They use the term ‘insularization’ to describe the decreased levels of children’s autonomous mobility around cities and the creation of special ‘islands’ of childhood to and from which they are transported (Zeiher, 2001, 2002). Within these institutions, but with significant variations according to national policy, it is possible to discern a struggle to tighten the regulation of children and to shape more firmly the outcomes of their activities. Schooling is a good example of this. In the last decades of the twentieth century the rather instrumental schooling regimes of the ‘Tiger Economies’ of Southeast Asia were held up as the model for producing economic efficiency and were widely influential in changing educational systems in Europe. I have argued elsewhere that this phenomenon represents a refocusing of modernity’s drive to control the future through children (Prout, 2000a). This tightening of control over children derives from a declining faith in other mechanisms of economic control, combined with increasing competitive pressures from the world economy. The intensification of global competition and the intricate networking of national economies erode the state’s capacity to control its own economic activity. In such circumstances, shaping children as the future labor force is seen as an increasingly important option. This, after all, is exactly what supply side economics is about but, as far as children are concerned, it often leads to attempts to regulate and standardize what they learn and how they learn it. References Boyden, J 1997, ‘Childhood and the Policy Makers’, in James, A and Prout, A (eds), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood (2nd edn), Falmer Press, London. Davie, R, Upton, G and Varma, V (eds) 1996, The Voice of the Child, Falmer Press, London. Flekkoy, GD and Kaufman, NH 1997, The Participation Rights of the Child: Rights and Responsibilities in Family and Society, Jessica Kingsley, London. Franklin, B 1995, Handbook of Children’s Rights: Comparative Policy and Practice, Routledge, London. Hart, R 1992, Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship, Innocenti Essays, Florence. Lansdown, G 1995, Taking Part: Children’s Participation in Decision Making, Institute for Public Policy Research, London. Lee, N 1999, ‘The Challenge of Childhood: The Distribution of Childhood’s Ambiguity in Adult Institutions’, Childhood, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 455-74. Lee, N 2001a, Childhood and Society: Growing Up in an Age of Uncertainty, Open University Press, Buckingham. Moss, P, Dillon, J and Statham, J 2000, ‘The â€Å"Child in Need† and â€Å"The Rich Child†: Discourses, Constructions and Practices’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 233-54. Nà ¤sman, E 1994, ‘Individualisation and Institutionalisation of Children’, in Qvortrup, J., Bardy, M., Sgritta, G. and Wintersberger, H. (eds), Childhood Matters: Social Theory, Practice and Politics, Avebury, Aldershot. Prout, A 2000a, ‘Control and Self-Realisation in Late Modern Childhoods’, Special Millenium Edition of Children and Society, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 304-15. Zeiher, H 2001, ‘Children’s Islands in Space and Time: The Impact of Spatial Differentiation on Children’s Ways of Shaping Social Life’, in du Bois-Reymond, M., Sunker, H. and Kruger, H.-H. (eds), Childhood in Europe: Approaches – Trends – Findings, Peter Lang, New York. Zeiher, H. (2002) ‘Shaping Daily Life in Urban Environments’, in Christensen, P. and O’Brien, M. (eds), Children in the City: Home, Neighbourhood and Community, London: Falmer Press.          How to cite Legal System and the Social Construction of Childhood, Essay examples

Reaction from the movie FROZEN free essay sample

â€Å"Frozen† was one of my favorite movies so far in my teenage life. It remains to be different from other movies that I had watched. Yes, most Disney movies are almost all about love, love and love for opposite genders but this movie is really not. I mean, it is about love but a kind of love that everyone else can ever be satisfied. This is about the love of a family specifically, the love a sister to another sister and this is what makes this kind of movie different from the rest. In this movie, I honestly became inspired not to crave for any boy and girl relationships. Actually, I never had one yet and do not plan to have one. It tells me that the love coming from my family is already enough for a teenager like me unless I became adult and can’t resist being in love in a person who I will think I am ready to get committed. We will write a custom essay sample on Reaction from the movie FROZEN or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Since I am referring to a love coming from my family or from my own sister, I will stick to this. Even the soundtracks of this movie made me say â€Å"I can relate in every lyrics sang. â€Å" I can say that this movie really stroked me based on what also happened to my sister and I a year ago. They said, it is normal to have fights with your siblings because we can never get away from problems and that became part of our lives. What happened was my sister and I had one fight that really changes everything about us. This is a kind of confidential story but I am willing to share a little. We grew up in different walls, I lived with my aunt since our mom left us and she lived with my grandmother for almost three to five years and went back to us when she reached sixth grade. Our house is not too far from the house where my grandmother lives. It was just like eight houses away from our house and we were just like neighbors. It’s just that sometimes during weekends; they are going to our house in the province. Everything was fine between us. We can still meet because were in the same school. The only thing that was different that time was our treatment of discipline. I was disciplined by my aunt and she was spoiled by my grandmother. Time came when she reached the sixth grade and she was with us already. She was okay and we are really in good vibes. Our fight was not just a fight or a normal fight of a sisterhood. Well, it was my fault of doing something like scold her and made her slept at the house of the Sisters of our school. Yes, she did not go home that time and yes, I was guilty of doing it. I tried sending her messages and apologies just to make her go home. I am guilty of scolding her and afraid what might happened to her. The next day came and I was the one who fetched her from the house of the Sisters. I confessed everything and made apologies to her. It took a lot of days for us to recover because when she went home, she was also scolded again by some people in our house which made me felt very guilty, afraid, and scared and a lot more synonyms of guilt. I was so sorry even I know she also had mistakes of not coming home but in my mind, I blamed myself. She also made apologies to me as I did and became friends or let say more than friends because we are sisters and even people will make our world upside down, we are still sisters. We shared love for each other and bonded a lot more and covered up the things we missed. This is why and how the movie â€Å"Frozen† stroked me. There was a part of the song â€Å"Do you wanna build a snowman? † that says â€Å"We only have each other, just you and me. What are we gonna do? † which really made me remembered everything. We don’t have our real parents with anymore so we only have each other whose going to be with each other no matter what. The story of â€Å"Frozen† is also about looking for a true love but it was the love of a sister to her sister that was true. We have to value and appreciate everything that our sister or even our brother is doing for us especially in our family’s case because at the very end, it will be just my sister and I.

Jacks Multiple Personalities in Fight Club

Jacks Multiple Personalities in Fight Club Free Online Research Papers When we first meet the main character, only identified as Jack, he has a gun to his head battling his split personality, Tyler Durdan. He then takes you back many months so you can know how it is he came to that state. Jack is a 30 year old single white male complaining of insomnia for over 6 months. His job as a liability consultant for an automotive company requires him to take frequent trips to different time zones, usually on a short notice, therefore leaving him jet lagged. This issue has endured for at least six months. He states he is in pain and wants something to just make him sleep. Jack states that on several occasions he has woken up in strange places and does not know how or when he got there. He realized that having blackouts (not due to substance abuse or general medical condition) was disturbing and unusual behavior. The doctor he visited dismisses his claims and suggests he attend a support group for cancer to witness real pain. An image of his alter-ego briefly appears at that moment. Due to his job, Jack does not have any immediate friends or family. He refers to the passengers on the planes as his single serving friend. Jack begins attending a variety of support groups for ailments that he does not have in order to do something during his bouts of insomnia. After the first few meetings, Jacks insomnia seemed to elapse and he uses the meetings as his sleeping pill. His recovery is short lived due to another fake survivor, Marla Singer. Her presence in his groups threatened his sleep because she knows that he is faking. The patient is coherent and can fully comprehend what is going on around him. His dress is appropriate however his clothes are unkempt. His hair is disheveled and dirty. He appears to look anxious with dark circles under his eyes and not shaven in a couple of days. His posture is slumped. PRESENTING PROBLEM: While on a plane returning from a business trip Jack meets Tyler Durdan, his split personality. Tyler is the complete opposite of Jack. He is everything that Jack wishes he could be. With his red tinted sunglasses and leather jacket he resembles more of a rock star as compared to Jacks drab wardrobe of white button up shirts and brown ties. Jack seems intrigued about Tyler and claims he is the most interesting single serving friend that he has ever met. When Jack returns to his condo he finds out that his apartment has exploded. All of his prize possessions, his IKEA furniture, have been destroyed. He feels pathetic of the fact that when they recover his belongings they will only find condiments in his refrigerator, thus exposing that he had no life. Jack called onto his inner self, Tyler to help rescue him from his dismal life. Jack retreats to a vacant house in the middle of no where and that is where the relationship between Jack and Tyler formulate. Initially, Jack is unaware tha t Tyler is not real. This is shown by the fact that he refers to himself as us, engages in conversions, fist fights with Tyler and at one point even sharing a beer with Tyler. SITUATIONS STRESSORS: Jack feels unsatisfied with his life. He feels abandoned by friends and most importantly his family. His father deserted the family when he was a little boy. His career leaves him discontented and unfulfilling. After the explosion of his condo his old personality, Jack, began to digress and Tyler Durdan was brought to surface. The initial meeting with Tyler ends in an altercation attack. Tyler encourages Jack to hit him, which in reality is really him. He has a physical fist fight with himself in the parking lot, leaving him badly bruised externally however emotional healed. The fighting allowed him to release all of his pent up frustrations with his life. From this emerged Fight Club. Fight Club was a place where men could go and fight each other to let it all go. Theyre fighting was a way to relieve stress for their cruel lives. These men felt refreshed and saw it as therapy. MENTAL STATUS EXAM: During the duration of the movie Jacks appearance continued to deteriorate. His clothes became more tousled. He went to work looking as if he didnt take a bath, wash his hair or shave, the circles under his eyes got darker and heavier. His shirts were often stained with blood and his face was always bruised from the fights. His boss noted his appearance and suggested he take time off to get himself together. Although Jack physically looked horrible, his work performance did not suffer. He would turn in his assignments on time and complete. When Tyler was in charge of the body he engaged in a sexual relationship with one time nemesis, Marla Singer. When Jacks personality would reappear after an encounter with her he would be verbally hostile towards her and kick her out of his house. Marla, who was a self destructive person to begin with, continued this relationship despite the verbal abuse she received from Jack. Jack continued to participate in Fight Club for over a year. He no longer needed the support groups to feel good about himself. The clubs grew from a few members, to hundreds, even thousands. As the Fight Clubs expanded, so did the destruction. It went from men fighting in the basement of a bar to vandalizing buildings, cars and other symbols of repression by society. In a sense, Fight Club turned into a mini-army of men who felt repressed by the government. Most of the men were blue collar workers who seemed as if they could never get ahead in life. They idealized Tyler Durdan and looked up to him as if he were God. They terrorized cities in his honor. The exposure from the media only fueled their zeal for destruction. As Fight Club grew so did the persona of Tyler Durdan. When Jack noticed these men were giving credit for their new found happiness only to Tyler, he felt jealous and rejected. SYMPTOMS OF IMPAIRED FUNCTIONING: Jacks bouts with insomnia, violent behavior, and black outs, interrupted his normal day to day living. When Jack had his insomnia, Tylers personality took over and got jobs where he could interject subtle doses of shock to people. For instance, he worked as a waiter where he urinated in the food. He also worked at a movie theater changing the film. Instead of just changing the rolls of film, he cut and pasted snippets of pornographic images into the film. The people viewing the movies only saw a snapshot of a naked person for less than a second. Jacks aggression carried over into his work place. When his boss became annoyed with his unkempt appearance, absenteeism and apathetic attitude he fired him. Instead of responding rational, Jack beat himself up in his bosss office and blackmailed by threatening to expose company corruption or to keep him on as an outside consultant in exchange for his silence. This afforded him and Tyler with more time to devote to Fight Club to participate i n the expansion in different cities and states. Most times when Jack involved himself with Tyler Durdan he was aware of what actions that Tyler was doing. He usually was a silent bystander while Tyler masterminded mayhem. Other times he would have outright conversations with Tyler in front of others, questioning his actions. The only times Jack was not conscious of what was going on around him was when he was with Marla Singer or traveling to recruit new members. PATIENTS STRENGTHS AND ASSETS: Even though Tyler Durdan had no respect for others, experienced no fear or regrets, Jacks caring disposition makes him rational in chaotic situations. He understands the difference between whats right and wrong. When Fight Club escalated to the mayhem that erupted on the city, Jack did not feel comfortable with it. He questioned Tylers intent; however, Tyler did not want Jack to be involved. He stated that Jack determined his own level of involvement with him. His regard for other people is evident when one the Fight Club members, Bob, was killed during a botched vandalism attempt. The other members of the club wanted to bury him in the back yard as if he were just evidence of their devious acts. Jack had to remind the men that he was a human being with feelings not just a disregarded object. Another example of Jacks softer side was obvious when he felt that Marla was in danger. He attempted to rescue her by putting her on a bus away from harms way. Tyler did not want Jack to discuss him or his actions to anyone, especially her. When the lines between Tyler and Jack started to get blurry, he went to Marla to ask her questions about Tyler. Once this door was opened, Tyler Durdan wanted to get rid of Marla to prevent Jack from seeking out more answers about reality. Tyler felt as though, once Jack knew that Tyler was really within him and causing all this havoc that he would retreat back to his old boring self. It is clearly apparent that Jack possess excellent organizational skills and leadership ability. The way he evolved fight club from a bunch of guys just fighting into an a group of soldiers conducting calculated terrorist attacks to the city was more on the lines of a General in the army instead of a Liability Consultant. Even though Tyler Durdans persona was the mastermind behind the coordination, the ability to do so came from deep within Jack. DIAGNOSIS: AXIS I: NONE AXIS IV: NONE AXIS II: DISSOCIATIVE IDENTITY DISORDER AXIS V: GAF SCORE-30 AXIS III: NONE DIAGNOSTIC COMMENTS: Jacks life was unfulfilling and unsatisfying. He had no friends or family. He lived alone and the only contact to the outside world was his job. Jack wanted a change in his life. The personality of Tyler Durdan was created to make Jack become the person he wished he could be. He created the other self to free himself from his bleak world. However, Jack was oblivious to the fact that he indeed was creating an alternate personality. After a car accident that Tyler caused, which Tyler Durdan referred to as a near life experience, he had a revelation and that is when it became apparent to him that he and Tyler were undoubtedly one in the same. Tyler Durdans philosophy on life was live life like you were dying while Jack was cautious and calculated. Since he worked as a Liability Consultant for an automotive company he saw the danger in everything. The split between the conscious happened once Jack was completely frustrated at how his life at 30 years old turned out. He intentionally blew up his condo to start fresh. However, when his alter-ego turned out to be more than he was willing to handle that is when he decided to wipe him out. He did this by attempting to kill himself in order to get rid of Tyler Durdan. Fortunately, he only killed Tyler Durdan not himself. TREATMENT GOALS Learn to disentangle Jack from his alternate personality Boost Self Esteem Teach Jack how to deal with situation stressors rationally Teach Jack how to control impulses Learn about healthy defense mechanisms TREATMENT PLAN Refer to a psychiatrist for long term individual therapy Recommend medication for depression or antic-psychotic behavior Hypnotherapy Research Papers on Jack's Multiple Personalities in Fight ClubThe Fifth HorsemanThe Spring and AutumnPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyWhere Wild and West MeetThe Masque of the Red Death Room meaningsNever Been Kicked Out of a Place This NiceMind TravelArguments for Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)Effects of Television Violence on Children19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided Era

John Battaglia Killed His Daughters for Revenge Against His Wife

John Battaglia Killed His Daughters for Revenge Against His Wife John David Battaglia shot and killed his two young daughters to get even with his ex-wife for reporting him to his  parole officer on a probation violation. A former Marine and CPA, John Battaglia was well liked by his friends and family. He appeared to be a good guy- fun spirited and charming. That was what MaryJean Pearle thought when she married him, but on their wedding night, Battaglias dark side began to emerge. At first,  he would fly off the handle and throw a few curse words and insults at his new wife. Pearle did not like it, but she put up with it  because they shared more good times together than bad. The following year  their first daughter, Faith, was born and then Liberty, three years later. Now with a family to consider, Pearle tried even harder to make the marriage work. An Idyllic Life With Hidden Secrets Living in an upscale neighborhood in Dallas, the small family seemed to have an idyllic life. But inside the home, Battaglias violent episodes began happening more often. He verbally abused Pearle, screaming obscenities at her and calling her vile names.   As time went on, the verbal attacks lasted longer and in an effort to keep her family together, Pearle endured it. The girls adored their dad, who had always been a gentle and loving father to them, even though his temper tantrums that he unleashed on Pearle continued to increase. Then one night, his anger switched from verbally attacking Pearle to going after her physically. She was able to get away and call 911. Battaglia was placed on probation and although he was allowed to see the girls, he was not allowed to enter their home. The separation gave Pearle a chance to think and it did not take long for her to realize that after seven years of abuse and having her children exposed to a lot of it, that it was time to file for a divorce. Christmas 1999 On Christmas day in 1999, Pearle allowed Battaglia to come into the home so he could visit with the girls. The visit ended in the two of them arguing and Battaglia violently attacking Pearle. He beat her with full force on the back of her head as she tried to protect herself from the blows. Battaglia was arrested and charged with assault. He was put on two years probation and was forbidden to have contact with Pearle. He could also not visit his daughters for 30 days. When the 30 days ended, normal weekly visitation started back up and so did the verbal assaults toward his ex-wife. Rage and Resentment The divorce came through the following August, but that did not deter Battaglia from leaving obscene and often threatening messages on his ex-wifes phone. As the threats progressed, Pearle became more fearful that one day her ex-husband might really act on what he was saying, but the thought that he would ever hurt the girls did not enter her mind. Visitation between the girls and their father continued. After a particularly frightening call from Battaglia in April 2001, Pearle decided it was time to get help. She contacted her ex-husbands probation officer and reported that he had been making threatening calls, which was a violation of his parole.   A few weeks later, on May 2, Battaglia found out that his parole had been revoked and that he was probably going to be arrested for the calls that he made to his ex-wife and for testing positive for marijuana.  He was assured by a police officer that the warrant would not be executed in front of his children and that he could make arrangements with his lawyer to peacefully turn himself in. He was scheduled to have the girls over for dinner that same night and Pearle,  not knowing that Battaglia had any knowledge that she had reported him to his parole officer, dropped off the girls with him at the normal meeting place. A Daughters Cry Later that evening, Pearle received a message from one of her daughters. When she returned the call, Battaglia put the call on speakerphone, and told his daughter Faith to ask her mother, Why do you want Daddy to go to jail? Then Pearle heard her daughter screaming, No, Daddy, please dont, dont do it. Gunshots  followed the childs cry and then Battaglia screamed, Merry (profanity) Christmas, then there were more gunshots. Mary Jean Pearle hung up the phone and frantically called 911. After shooting 9-year-old Faith three times and 6-year-old Liberty five times Battaglia went to his office where he left one more message, but this time to his dead daughters. Goodnight my little babies, he said. I hope youre resting in a different place. I love you, and I wish that you had nothing to do with your mother. She was evil and vicious and stupid. I love you dearly. Then he met up with a girlfriend and went to a bar and then to a tattoo shop and had two red roses tattooed on his left arm in honor of his daughters that he had just murdered. Battaglia was arrested as he left the tattoo shop at 2 a.m. It took four officers to restrain and handcuff him. Officers took a fully loaded revolver from Battaglias truck after his arrest. Inside his apartment, police found several firearms and the automatic pistol used in the shootings laying on the kitchen floor. Autopsy Faith had three gunshot wounds, including a shot to her back which severed her spinal cord and ruptured her aorta, a contact shot to the back of her head which exited her forehead, and a shot to her shoulder. Either of the first two shots would have been rapidly fatal. Six-year-old Liberty had four gunshot wounds and a graze wound to the top of her head. One shot entered her back, severed her spinal cord, went through a lung, and lodged in her chest. After losing about one-third of her blood, she received a contact shot to her head which passed through her brain, exited her face, and was immediately fatal. A History of Abuse is Revealed In less than 20 minutes of deliberation, the jury found Battaglia guilty of murder.   During the  punishment phase of the  trial, Battaglias first wife,  Michelle Gheddi, testified about the abuse she had suffered during their marriage that lasted from 1985 to 1987, and then after their divorce. Twice  Battaglia was physically violent toward Gheddis son from a previous marriage. Once when Ms. Gheddi was traveling with  Battaglia  in the car, he became angry at some other motorists and tried to reach for a gun he had in the car. They separated after an incident in which Battaglia struck Gheddi while she was holding their daughter Kristy, causing her to drop the child. After the separation, Battaglia stalked Gheddi,  watched her through the windows of her home, followed her in his car and somehow managed to tap her phone line.  He called Gheddis employers and creditors and made false statements about her. He threatened to kill himself and her, and once described to her in detail how he planned to cut her up and kill her with a knife. One night Gheddi woke up sometime after midnight to find her estranged husband standing over her bed and holding her shoulders down. He wanted to have sex, but she refused. Later she filed a police report about the incident. In January of 1987, Battaglia spent several days in jail after throwing a rock at Gheddi through her car window. After his release, things seemed to improve, but for only for a few months. Gheddi again filed charges against Battaglia after two more violent episodes.  Battaglia begged her to drop the charges, but she refused. Later that day, he approached Gheddi outside of her sons school. Smiling as he came toward her, he told her, If Im going back to jail, Im going to make it worth my while. He then beat Gheddi until she lost consciousness, breaking her nose and dislocating her jaw. After she got out of the hospital, he threatened to do the same to her son, so she moved to Louisiana At noon on the day that Faith and Liberty were killed,  Battaglia left a message on Gheddis  answering machine saying that maybe Pearl should lose her kids. He left another message later that evening for Kristy, telling her that he was sending her money for college and to use it wisely. Psychiatric Testimony Four forensic psychiatrists testified about  Battaglias mental state when he murdered his children.  They all agreed that Battaglia suffered from bipolar disorder, and all but one of the doctors thought that with the proper medication and under a controlled environment, he was a low risk for future criminal violence. All of the doctors testified that Battaglia knew what he was doing when he murdered his daughters. Death Sentence On May 1, 2002, after deliberating for close to seven hours, the jury agreed with the prosecutors who felt that the murders were a result of Battaglia seeking revenge because of his ex-wifes actions and that he could pose a possible threat in the future.  Battaglia, who was 46 years old at the time, was sentenced to death  by lethal injection. Best Little Friends Referring to his daughters as his best little friends, Battaglia told The Dallas Morning News that he did not feel like he had killed his daughters and that he was, a little bit in the blank about what happened. During the interview Battaglia showed no remorse for murdering his daughters,  instead placing the blame for his situation on his ex-wife, the prosecutor, the judge and the news media. He said that  Pearle was putting a lot of financial pressure on him and that after the divorce he had to work two jobs to keep up with his obligations.   On the night that he shot and killed his daughters, he said that Faith had told him that  Pearle was trying to have him arrested. Stressed out, exhausted, angered and wanting  Pearle to suffer, he did the one thing he knew would hurt her the most. He killed the children, although he says he has little memory of the actual event. Execution Halted Hours Before Battaglia was Scheduled to Die John Battaglia,  age 60,  was scheduled for lethal injection on Wednesday, March 30, 2016, for the revenge killing of his two young daughters, but the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals  put a halt to it. The court agreed with Battaglias attorney that he has a right to claim that he is too mentally incompetent and delusional to be executed investigated. Battaglia was eventually executed by lethal injection on Feb. 1, 2018, in the  Texas State Penitentiary at Huntsville, Texas.

Carbon dioxide emissions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Carbon dioxide emissions - Essay Example During the process of burning fossil fuels such as petroleum, coal, and gas, carbon dioxide is released. Deforestation can be also a cause of carbon emissions, since the carbon sequestered in trees is released to the atmosphere, as there is shortage of trees to counter balance the gas. Nevertheless, transportation accounts for a high level of carbon emissions since vehicles, trains, planes, boats and trucks are involved in the production of carbon dioxide fumes. In addition, human beings greatly contribute to the emissions of carbon dioxide, through use of electricity in lighting, heating, and air conditioning service. This is because the generation of electricity leads to a high level of carbon dioxide emissions. The industry sector also plays a major role in the emission of carbon gasses; this is due to the processes involved in production and manufacturing of goods. According to Smith (2007), in the past 25 years, emissions of carbon dioxide in Australia have risen dramatically, due to a large number of fossil fuels being burnt in the country. In addition, despite Australia having a population of 0.32% of the world’s population, it produces a very high level of carbon emissions, which is 1.43%, meaning that each person pollution levels are 4.5 times the global average (Smith 2007). In addition, â€Å"over the past 25 years, the growth of carbon emissions in Australia, was twice the growth rate for the world as a whole, twice the growth rate for USA and Japan, and five times the growth rate for Europe† (Raupach, 2007).

Food and culture Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Food and culture - Essay Example When people eat, they spend time together and tell stories about life and they plan together for the future. It is a big part of people’s lives. It gives families time to share together and build relationships between family members. Eating food allows passing on customs and traditions that are being forgotten. Food also affects culture in other ways. Human societies are groups of people who interact with each other. But some of the things that make people act the way they do are the food cultures that people grow and share all over the world. Most of the plants and animals people eat grow in a farm. Although many of the food people eat have been there for thousands of years, the ways of growing and raising the food have changed. As ways to farm changed, so did the way land was developed. Understanding food and the environment, people see how the connections of plants and animals had an influence on nature. People then search for ways that agricultural methods can be similar to natural ways. More than 10,000 years ago, humans began the change from hunting and gathering to designing and managing the landscape to serve their needs. People began to control characteristics and develop technology to grow crops and raise animals to fit their tastes. In Guanxi Province in China, for instance, farmers built slopes into step-like terraces (Alba 15). By changing the environment of their surroundings, people can grow food in places that otherwise would not support crops. Preserving food makes it less perishable and easier to transport. Similarly, the obento, a Japanese child’s school lunch, gives cultural messages to a person who is not Japanese. The specific foods and how they are prepared symbolize a connection between home and school. The obento thus plays an important part in identifying a culture (Anderson 103). Early food agriculture helped society grow into cities and states. Anywhere one looks in the world, food affects culture. So

Should Race Be Used as a Form of Identity?

Should Race Be Used as a Form of Identity? Identity is based on being the same as some people and different  from others. The difference is usually equally weighted discuss with  reference to the category of race. Identity is one of the most heavily debated factors of modern social life. This is represented in the corpus of sociological research, by the importance placed upon its influence in the different ways in which individuals and societies conceptualise themselves and others. Identity, first and foremost, is based upon the notion of being the same as some people (to identify with some people), and to be different from others. This can and often is interpreted as identity having both a positive and a negative aspect, positive in identifying with a social group, and negative in being different (or opposing) another. This may not necessarily be the case however. In this paper I will investigate the use of race as an identity, as this has traditionally presented us with both the positive and negative model of identity, and in more recent times, a more positive model in both identity and difference. Identity, in its most basic sense, is formed from being ‘other’ than another particular person or group. This basic difference comes in many forms, from gender, to class, nationality, sexual orientation and race or ethnicity. Whilst these are the some of the more major identity groups, there are countless other ways in which people identify with each other, from a lifestyle guided by a certain musical taste to a radical political identification. Identity therefore remains a very important way in which people understand themselves and the world. Any one person will belong to a number of different identity groups however. A person might, for example, be a British national with an Asian ethnicity, and belong to a particular political group and economic class. Whether or not one particular facet of a person’s identity is more important than the others, is a matter that is fiercely debated. For some theorists such as Miller (1997:11), ‘nations are ethical communities. They are contour lines in the ethical landscape. The duties we owe to our fellow-nationals are different from, and more extensive than, the duties we owe to human beings as such’. Miller and others argue that nationality is the most important way in which people identify themselves, and as such it renders their responsibilities to co-nationals much greater than to others. Whilst Perry (2001:103-108) argues that gender is the most important identity group, and that feminism is in danger of being watered-down and destroyed by theories that place too much emphasis on the multi-faceted nature of an individual’s identity. For, she argues (2001:107), ‘Women of all ethnicities, sexual preferences, and even classes, will be disadvantaged by proposed changes in welfare regulation, means-tested custody, and the rolling back of abortion rights and affirmative action guidelines’. Marxi st theorists argue however that class is the most important factor in social identity, for the economic class you belong to will determine whether or not you have political control over you and your society’s future. Hence Marx’s (2001:8) famous opening line to his Communist Manifesto, ‘The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles’. For the purposes of this paper however, I am going to focus on the influence that race plays in identity formation, and its relationship with the other facets of identity. Race has long been debated in sociological circles, but precisely what race is or even whether it exists to any significant level has been placed in doubt by a number of theorists. Todorov (1999:64-70) argues that for a theory of races (or racialism) to exist, it needs to have five different presuppositions. Firstly the racialist must suppose that there are different races of people at all. Scientifically such a position is untenable, but, as Todorov argues, whether or not the man in the street thinks this way does not depend upon science. Secondly the racialist must suppose that people are not only racially separated by appearances, but that there are lines of division amongst cultures too, which are intimately linked with racial appearances. The third supposition is that the behaviour of an individual is profound ly affected by their race. Fourthly there is a hierarchy of values between differing races, and lastly that some political order should be in place to reflect all the previously mentioned factors. For Todorov racialist doctrine has not gone away but has merely changed its form, from discourses based on race to those of culturalism and nationalism. For Todorov then there are many different presuppositions that have to be in place before race itself as a significant identity can be considered. But, as he himself notes, there is an ideological form of racialism which is pure and simply racist and does not rely upon theoretical grounding or offer any form of justification. This is racist behaviour and attitude is the most common one in society, and this behaviour can only create and galvanise race or ethnic identity. This can take occur in both a positive and negative fashion, in that one group might define itself in a positive nature when under pressure from another, or one group might violently negate another and try to eradicate it. In such circumstances, the significance that race or ethnicity plays in identity is accentuated and becomes more important than other factors. Indeed, according to Assad (1993), minorities in modern states are faced with two stark choices; they can submit to complete assimilation or be despised as d ifferent. In such circumstances, the identity under threat comes to the fore of the life of the person in question. To submit to the majority is to lose your identity, but to keep it is to face hostility and conflict. Of course, the situation that Assad presents us with is somewhat extreme. But whereas in most circumstances the differences among people might be treated with equal weight, within the boundaries of a nation state trying to forge a unifying identity, racial and ethnic identity does become more important. Britain, for example, present us with a multicultural society that incorporates a whole range of people from different ethnic, religious and economic backgrounds. But this does not mean that racial discrimination and intimidation does not occur. As Solomos (2003) argues, the long history of racial discrimination in Britain has led to political activists in all the main political parties, whose aim and purpose is to fight for the rights of ethnic minorities. Such developments galvanise people around their ethnicity and form new identities with which people differentiate themselves against others. The Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies in the 1980s were interested in precisely this: A major concern of the group was the need to analyse the complex processes by which race is constructed as a social and political relation. They emphasised that the concept of race is not simply confined to a process of regulation operated by the state but that the meaning of race as a social construction is contested and fought over. In this sense they viewed race as an open political construction where the meaning of terms such as black are struggled over. Collective identities spoken through race, community and locality are, for all their spontaneity, powerful means to coordinate action and create solidarity (Solomos 2003:28). Race can therefore be theorised not as a natural category or regulation of the state, but as a political construction where identity can be formed in order to fight for social justice. This political use of race argues that racial divisions in society are a cause of major differences in quality of life, and therefore racial identity is of much more importance than other factors. Such division can however cause greater resentment amongst different social groups and put more emphasis on difference than on similarity. While positive discrimination by the dominant social group, in an attempt to redress the power balance between different segments of society, can often enflame racial tension. As Solomos (2003:192) argues, anti-racists are often depicted as doing more harm to race relations than extreme rightwing fanatics. This is because they highlight racial differences and polarise people between different racial identities. It could be argued however that anti-racists do not create rac ial tension, but merely highlight tension that is already there. In any case, the importance that race plays in everyday social life is clearly evident. Anwar (1998:99-100), for example, claims that racial discrimination against Asian people has been on the rise in recent years in Britain, and that in 1994 alone there were 170,000 instances of racially motivated crimes and threats, whilst an estimated 74 people have been killed by racist attacks between 1970 and 1989. Racial identity can motivate people not only to dislike and slander each other, but even to reach the extremes of violence and murder. With this in mind race is quite obviously, although without any ultimate justification, the deciding factor in a person’s identity in many social situations, overriding other factors such as gender, political affiliations or, very often, religion. Scott (2002) renders this assumption problematic however by researching the roots of racism from a Marxist perspective. Whilst race and racism clearly do have an important impact in social identity, this is for Scott a modern phenomenon with historically traceable roots. Scott argues that modern racism is intimately related with that of capitalism, and that whilst racism has always figured in societies in different forms, it is only with capitalism that it becomes a constant factor. Early slavery in the New World, for example, was largely made up from white slaves from England before the large influx from the West Indies and Africa. The English ruling classes had no qualms about exploiting the white working classes, but in the end the demand for labour at home rendered the practice of shipping white slaves over to the Americas as inefficient. Using Blackburn’s analysis of racism and capitalism, Scott (2002:167) argues that racism is linked to capitalist growth, national identi ty and the individualising of the populace. Its development was associated with several of those processes which have been held to define modernity: the growth of instrumental rationality, the rise of national sentiment and the nation-state, racialized perceptions of identity, the spread of market relations and wage labor, the development of administrative bureaucracies and modern tax systems, the growing sophistication of commerce and communication, the birth of consumer societies, the publication of newspapers and the beginnings of press advertising, â€Å"action at a distance† and an individualist sensibility (Blackburn in Scott (2002:167). A further Marxist analysis might consider the influence that alienated labour has on divisive notions of race (see Manson 2000:20). For Marx, man becomes alienated from his labour in a capitalist society, because he no longer has any control over the products of his labour. He therefore becomes reduced to an atomistic cog in a productive machine, alienated from his work and society. Pseudo-identities can then be formed and people coerced into assuming them to fill in the lack of meaning left by his lack of control over his social production. Furthermore, the crux of Marxist theory rests upon the notion that the ‘class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same time over the means of mental production, so that, generally speaking, the ideas of those who lack the means of mental production are subject to it’(Marx and Engels 1970:64). This means that it is the ruling economic class, which are the people who control the means of produ ction, that disseminate ideas and values throughout the rest of society. Notions of race are therefore inherently linked with the prevailing ideas of capitalist production and the values and ideas that this produces. Whilst the Marxist analysis does not refute the existence of racism, nor can it deny its powerful and destructive effects, it does suggest that the existence of racial discourse is the product of an underlying one, that of the capitalist economy. Whether this is correct or not, it does at least render problematic the notion that race is a distinct and unique form of identity. This also calls into question whether or not race really is more important than other forms of identity, or whether its existence is part of an underlying form of identity production.

Boundary Issues

The term boundary can be understood to mean something that indicates a boarder or a limit. This is in other words a boarder or limit so indicated. This can as well be classified into two major classes of boundaries as can be seen here:- Divergent boundaries-using the geographical aspect of explanation, it can be described as occurrence at the point where two plates move away from each other. This creates more crust at the point of separation. Convergent boundaries-this is when the plates are moving into one another neither sub ducting into the other but pushing up the crust.Crust slip boundary-this can be termed another division where plates are colliding into one another at an angle. Tension builds and released inform of an earthquake. All human love and dialog is a striving to reconcile our longing for the gone bliss of togetherness with our equally intense desire for separateness (cited Jane Adams, PhD). Human minds encompass these conflicting issues through creation and uncreatio n of boundaries. These are mental issues and structures that increase in their nature of complexity and number. This does happen when we meet other people and develop our own capacities.We are able to identify our thoughts and feelings together with our emotions from those of others. This comes to happen simply because they tend to format all our memories and thinking, experiences, emotions and sensations in our identity. They do not occupy our geographical but rather mental phenomenon in our minds. This creates a real boarder in our minds. Boundaries define how self identifies itself. They do not only determine where you begin but also where you end. This goes to the space between us too. Boundaries are responsible for how we deal with the dilemma of being human.Self-in-dilemma defines how we identify and relate with others. This too stretches to identifying ourselves by maintaining our identity by our autonomy and independence. One thing that is so clear is that relationship diffe rences are as a result of boundaries. This has been seen frequently being encountered between parents and children, spouses, partners, friends and professional colleagues. Intimacy, loneliness, conflict, anxiety, stress and challenges at every stage of life are dealt with by the creation of boundaries. The development of our personalities is central to this as well as how our identity s identified.This is defined to how we think and feel about ourselves and how others perceive us. This is a special lens through which we perceive ourselves, how we are and why we are those kinds of people that we are able to see in ourselves. Limits of inner boundaries Many at times we might argue but the truth of the matter is that generic inheritance is responsible for the shaping of our inner boundaries (this is meant to identify with individual neuro chemistry, how sensitive the amygdala is and the connection of various parts of the brains among other things).Habits of the mind, neuro chemistry an d temperament dictate the extend to which our inner boundaries are connected or separate our thoughts and feelings, distinction of our mental experiences, from those of others, how they absorb or deflect the influence of their thought, moods and voices on our own and distinction among the identity, ego and superego. This gives the conscious, unconscious and preconscious contents of our minds and their property. Connection between inner boundaries and addiction Boundaries hail from recovery movement. Boundaries dysfunction and confusion coupled withdistortion are symptomatic of drug problems, alcohol, food, sex spending and other substances or activities that are considered to be addictive in nature. Addiction and recovery literature touches on boundaries and it does generally give a short attention to inner boundaries and rather focuses on interpersonal ones. Boundaries go not only to the extend of affecting the relationship with others but also emotional balance , personalities, co gnitive ability, career choice, art preference, music and architecture, political views and opinion not forgetting attitude. It also stretches to attitudes towards money and time.As an influence of personality, it is so surprising how boundaries are overlooked yet they are so an important aspect of our lives. This is so for psychiatrists who are concerned with individual rather than individual in relationship to. When we are discussing issues to do with boundaries, we should talk of boundaries and hoe they affect us directly and their influence on the people living around us. The world being a global village, and human beings being the only existent social beings in nature, the comfort of our neighbors should be of great interest to us.When we live as a community, we should put in mind the immediate aspect of how our neighbors are and not just the single life existing between us. Mental illness is the hallmark of distorted inner boundaries and this explains why they end up behaving like so, interpersonal psychiatrists differently think about boundaries(inner ones). They look at how they shape our social upbringing and as well how they organize or disorganize the contents of our minds . When inner boundaries are termed porous or weak , then the self is empty and famished . Forever one will be in search of someone to fill or repair it.In case we make it more rigid and solid ,it is always hard to let other people understand us,touch us or even move us, when we distort them to the worst ,so is the person himself. This means no psychological growth can occur within us social workers in practice encounter situations that end up bringing boundary problems or potential boundary problems. In a situation where workers face workers encounter conflict of interest , boundary problems arise. This is dual or several relationship boundary issues. Multiple relationships are as result of professional engaging in more than one relationship.Relationships have been established to be common primarily among social workers and their current workers and their colleagues. Discussions mainly focuses on dual relationship especially exploitive ones. As seen with social workers who get sexually involved with clients , this is a clear explanation of social dual dual boundary problem, This has been seen over a range of acts inclusive of providing home telephone number for official events, accepting goods and services from people one is not supposed to, ranging as far fetched issues as well.Jayarante et all , 1997 noted â€Å" and now swinging in a narrower arc the arm of controversy and can be done away with and dual relationships like sexual attachment with clients should be avoided greatly. It would be good that professionals continue to work with integrity and dignity and to bring out the difference concerning sexual relationships that we should be able to avoid as much as possible. (pg 190) One has a broader examination lense and a fine toned understanding of the levels which we should be able to get ourselves involved.Sexual relationship prohibitions between doctors and students have been described not to be a thing of the late twentieth century. The physician-patient relationship demands the doctor be very disciplined to ensure that the patient . Doctors should do everything to avoid relationship that will impair their professional judgment or the possibility of creating a dirty game that erodes the trust and confidence placed in them by their patients The question of whether the situations of sexual misconduct between doctors and patients is as bad as itappears to be remains and snag between peoples mind. Some have argued that the situation is being overstated and people have kept citing the same incident to justify their overstatements. Which has always said that the the case is understatement. For the purpose of better understanding of this problem, a review of the available cases and their sources has to be done. Data has shown that th e the studies were conducted through selection of cases based on anonymity through the mail.The first case was the collection of data by asking the patients and practitioners being asked to tell how many of the practitioners being asked to tell how many of their friend and have been involved in a similar act with their partners. The second case did not account for the patients who had been involved in the issue with several practitioners and reported over the last 25 years. Boundary issues come in more than one sharpened size and addresses most fundamental aspects of the therapeutic practice, Regarding boundary issues, the therapist is responsible for two kinds of standards.†Minimal standards being the first one is the most mandatory and whenever violated it leads to punishment. † â€Å" Aspirational standards† comes next even though it is not as mandatory as such and do not participate in the punishment of the individuals. They are sources which we should underst and and work towards achieving in order to have the best out of our professions. A professional therapist will get engaged in both minimal and aspirational standards to ensure that he achieves the best and avoidance of the blunders in life.Among the issues that can be understood as boundary issues ranges from being a clients friend being differentiated from being their therapist, formation in therapy of sexually intimate relations, offering the client non licensed services from the reason when you first met and failure to keep your private life away from the client. Through assessing the following issues one is able to understand himself better and work towards getting the best deal out of his working relationship with his clients.This also does promote the ethical way of living. The client feels more of a friend with you than a client at the end of the therapy session. One might also feel sexually aroused in the response to a client. It may also come in a sense when one would like to be lovers with a client at the end of the therapy session. Do you ever have sexual contact with the client? You often go into careful selection of your clothes with a specific client in mind. It is also seen in times when a particular clients time always runs overtime.Engaging in friendly talks with the client thus revealing so much of yourself towards a particular client. Healthy boundaries have also been described to exist whatsoever. This has been described through willingness to say no in order to clearly notify others that they are stepping on your toes. Controversially, you are also willing to say yes. One too has the ability to make requests and seek alternatives when other people say no to him. It also comes with one having a sense of personal understanding and self respect. It stretches too to making self disclosure appropriate.One reveals information about himself gradually and this comes at a time when self respect has been developed leading to development in trust. Mu tual sharing must be the guiding factors to this. Lastly one never tolerates abuse or disrespect. You should recognize when the problem is yours or the other person’s. if it doesn’t have to be yours, you simply don’t jump in to provide a solution but instead let the other person be responsible for his own boundaries. At times, a situation of collapsed or no boundaries has been described. This has been manifested through several states as well.When one can’t say no for fear of abandonment or rejection. One discloses too much information about himself or herself. If one takes no other people’s feelings apart from empathy and high tolerance for abuse and being treated with disrespect it dearly demonstrates collapsed boundaries. It further stretches to the feeling of â€Å"I believe I deserve it† when treated badly. This is coupled with doing anything to avoid conflict with other people. Being focused on achieving what you believe other people w ant you to be letting you have no sense of noting fully in others.You always want to act to please other people and in return forget all about molding respected and responsible individual in yourself. Boundaries can be important in our lives. They do give us ownership. A boundary can in simple terms be described as a property line. Knowing where our property starts and ends one is able to understand and have a claim of ownership over the given property. We tend to understand what belongs to us and what doesn’t at the same time. Through having boundaries and having defined the extent of ownership it does give us a sense of responsibility.We are responsible for keeping well what belongs to us. As such, individuals are taught to take good care of what belongs to them so that we do not interfere with other people’s freedom and rights. This helps understanding where one’s freedom or control starts and ends. Understanding the freedom one has from the spouse we are abl e to open up several other opportunities. As clearly understood that your next door neighbor cannot force you paint your house walls green or red we tend to understand that we cannot poke our noses into other people’s affairs and expect to do away with it.The triangle of boundaries revolves around freedom, love and responsibility. We were created free by God and given the responsibility for our freedom as well. Being set free, makes us be responsible for our deeds failure for which leads to prosecution. As stated in the whole bible we are asked to love God and worship him all along. God expects us to live free and take responsibility for our own freedom besides loving him so much. If we accomplished these three events of life, then life becomes a bed of roses and an Eden of experience. Incredibility occurs as these three ingredients of life do happen.When love grows, spouses become more and more free of slavery; being self centered, living patterns that are sinful and limitat ions that are self imposed tend to fade away. This leads to spouses gaining a greater sense of self control and responsibility. As a result of acting more responsibly one becomes more loving. This sends back to the start the cycle all over again. The secret towards happiness in a long lasting relationship is this one. A couple married for more than 10 years can boast of this since they learn to become more of themselves with time and get more loved in return.Love has been known to exist only where there is freedom. Protection is the last aspect of boundaries. Taking an example of a home or a house, one is always struggling to keep his house under lock and key to ensure that there is protection and safety. It was said by Jesus that dogs should not be given what is sacred. Our (pearks) should not be thrown to pigs instead. They might trample them under their feet and immediately they are done they will turn to tear you into pieces (cited Matthew 7:6). These fences are used to keep the bad ones out and only let in the good ones.This means that the permeability of boundaries is an issue. As with individuals, one needs boundaries that can be put up when the evil is present and be laid down when the dangerous states are done with. Living within truth makes us safe. This regards truth as another very important boundary. Boundaries are provided with the truth and principle of guidance from God. When we do the following we define it as truth; do not lie or commit adultery, coveting other peoples property like the story in the bible, readiness to give to others, loving one another, being compassionate and readiness to forgive.Crossing boundaries of relationships centered around God's truth endangers our success and how well we can thrive. Honesty and truthfulness about what happens in our relationships is a good provision of our boundaries. There are certain law that govern the boundary issues as seen in marriages. Sowing and reaping This should be interpreted to mean t hat our actions have consequences or repercussions. When we do positive things about us, we tend to draw people closer to us and as a result they do become more loving and accommodating to us.They feel more attached to us and more than willing to be with us and stay attached to us. We always send them to a state of wanting to be with us at the same time being more positive to us. The moment we become irresponsible and unloving, people tend to keep distance from us. They run away from us and feel like not wanting to be associated with us. We are left alone and the consequences are feeling lonely and withdrawn. This teaches us to be responsible knowing that if we messed around with other peoples emotions they in turn end up leaving us alone and keeping us in a state of wanting to be close again.The law of responsibility This means that the spouses refuses to rescue their partners from mistakes and foibles committed by them. This is the sinful behavior of being immature. The couples ha ve the responsibility of setting limits to the level that their spouses are held up in the unbecoming behavior. This is a clear state of the mind being exercised by the partners tending to build up maturity in their spouses. When such a state of the mind is created, then the entire consequence is having a mature society as a whole. The law of powerThis law comes out to be a unique one. It does so in the sense that it does empower the couples with the ability to change their marriages. One has the capacity to get out whatsoever he or she wants from the marriage and not acting as a result of pressure from other sources. As a result, the act of saying that we let nature take its course is done away with. When we let nature take its course we end up in a situation that does not allow us to set our own targets. Setting targets is the first thing that any human being can think of and be able to achieve.It encourages us to work hard and be alert in all situations. A human being who doesn't work with any target ends up being distorted and the final resettling becomes a thing of the past. It is only when you and your mate understand and go to the extend of respecting each others needs that you can selflessly give to one another. The creating of boundaries in marriages gives you the right tools you actually deserve to come out to the right decision. Boundary issues appear to be dominant in many places. It does not only apply to human setting but has been noted even in national parks.Boundary management has become a major concern issue even in these places. Boundary making traces its origin straight from the animal kingdom. From time immemorial, animals have been known from time immemorial to lay boundaries within themselves. The king of the jungle was the lion and the cascading system was used to place animals in different places in the jungle. This led to the assignment of tasks based on boundaries. Man has had to derive his present governance system on the very basis that the animal kingdom operated. Just like the animals defined their boundaries so has man become of late.This has been seen to range from individual relationships to group relations and even stretches to the international level. Long before the introduction of the state governance system, we used to have traditionally instituted societies that lived and respected the presence and sovereignty of other neighboring states. Failure to do do this would lead to endless wars among the competing societies something that led to restoration of peace in the society. It is clear that boundary issues cut across all spheres of our living and we tend to have them in our day to day living.These are issues that affect our living and we cannot be able to have a peaceful society without boundary issues coming into play. As a matter of fact, we do understand that human coexistence is based on the fact that one has to respect the sovereignty of the other. Be it at individual or collective responsibili ty level, the secret behind colleagues having some mutual understanding is recognition of the rights and freedoms of the other members of the society. If human beings lived by this, the society remains to be a peaceful one.As clearly seen in this paper, if one has to maintain his dignity, define the level to which you do relate with others and keep a clear distinction between your work and the social life. When a clear cut distinction has been put between the two cases, then the society understands the need for boundaries and as a result, we are able to have a peaceful society. Word count 3482 References â€Å"Boundary Issues†: Using Boundary Intelligence ti Get The Intimacy You Want and The Independence You Need In Life, Love and Work. † by Jane Adams (Wiley, October, 2005)Ludwig Edelstein. The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation and Interpretation. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1943. Federation Of State Medical Boards of The US,Inc. , Ad Hoc Committee On Physician Im pairment. Report on Sexual Boundary Issues, April, 1996. Irons, RR. Schneider JP. Addictive Sexual Disorders in Principles and Practices of Addictions In Psychiatry, Miller. NS ed. , pp. 441-457, 19997. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Opinion On Ethics:Sexual Misconduct In The Physician Patient Relationship, Document Number. 1